Home Blog Page 308

All About Zwift Racing League Playoffs and Promotion/Relegation

13

Tomorrow is the final race of Zwift Racing League Season 2 – a TTT on London’s Greatest London Flat.

But this season is ending differently that ZRL’s Season 1. This time around, top teams are being invited to a Battle Royale Play-Off on Friday and Saturday! Here are the details, including notes about how relegation and promotion will work for all teams…

Playoff Schedule

The two-day event takes place on March 5th and 6th:

  • March 5 – Points Race on Richmond UCI Worlds (2 Laps)
    • Men Race at 19:05 UTC (14:05 Eastern, 11:05 Pacific)
    • Women Race at 19:45 UTC (14:45 Eastern, 11:45 Pacific)
    • Powerups: Aero, Burrito, Feather
    • Intermediates: Monument Ave Sprint, Broad Street Sprint, Libby Hill KOM (both laps)
  • March 6 – TTT on Watopia’s Magnificent 8 (1 Lap)
    • Women Race at 19:05 UTC (14:05 Eastern, 11:05 Pacific)
    • Men Race at 19:45 UTC (14:45 Eastern, 11:45 Pacific)

See WTRL’s Courses & Times page for route details including powerups and intermediates.

Playoff Participants

Only Division 1 teams are invited to the playoffs. More specifically, only the top 2 teams in each Division 1 are invited.

So if your ZRL Division was A-1, B-1, C-1, or D-1, and you finish 1st or 2nd in your division after race #8, you are eligible to compete in the playoffs.

Playoff Structure

The playoffs are points-based, just like the regular season. All team points will be reset to 0 heading into the playoffs, then the normal points structure will be used for the two playoff races.

The winner in each division will be the team with the highest team score after the two playoff races.

Playoff Rules

Teams can’t bring in “ringers” for the playoffs – squads have to be defined beforehand, and riders must have completed at least 4 teams with their ZRL team in order to race for that time in the playoffs. Furthermore, some ZADA verification will be in place for all participants.

Rule specifics from WTRL:

  • Nominated squads of 10: 4-6 compete each day
  • All riders in squad must have completed at least 4 races with the ZRL Team.
  • ZADA assisted verification for A1 Teams – basic height and weight verification for B-1, C-1 & D-1 teams.
  • A-1 Division teams must:
    1. connect trainer as primary power source (not pedals/crank/hub power meter)
    2. dual record and submit files within 2 hours of each race’s completion
    3. wear a fully-functioning HRM connected and transmit to Zwift
    4. submit height and weight video taken within 12 hours of race start

Note: the A-1 requirements above are basic requirements of the ZRL Premier Division, which is governed by Zwift’s ESports Ruleset. For further details, see Zwift Cyling Esports Rules.

What Is At Stake?

This weekend’s playoff will determine which A-1 teams get promoted to the ZRL Premier Division. This is a big deal, as the Premier Division is where cash prizes are awarded, races are live-streamed by Zwift, and teams get a custom in-game kit.

In many ways, promotion to Premier Division is the Zwifty equivalent of moving from amateur to pro team status. It’s the top of the heap in terms of Zwift racing, and you can be sure A-1 teams will give all they have to get promoted!

For lower categories (B, C, and D) this weekend’s playoff is just an optional championship round which doesn’t affect promotion and relegation in any way. These categories are competing for a title – nothing more. Whoever wins the Battle Royale will be crowned “Season 2 World Champion” for their category, but promotion and relegation are based on regular-season results (see below).

Promotion (and Relegation)

Once race 8 is finished, WTRL will finalize promotions and relegations between divisions. The promotions and relegation structure is fairly simple: the top two teams in each Division will be promoted up to the next division, and the bottom 2 will be relegated down a division.

The only exception to this is if you’re in a top or bottom division for a category (eg, B-1, or perhaps C-5). Teams will not be forced to promote up to a new category (eg, B-1 to A-4). Rather, WTRL says those teams, and especially dominant 1st-place teams in Division 1, will be encouraged to promote up to the next category. Teams will never be relegated to a lower category, so if you were a bottom team in a bottom division (say, C-5), you won’t be relegated to a D Division.

Examples:

  • You placed 1st or 2nd in your B-2 Division. You will be promoted to B-1.
  • You placed 1st or 2nd in your D-1 Division. You will be encouraged to promote to C-4 (or whatever the lowest C division is for your sub-region).
  • You placed last (or second-to-last) in your A-1 Division. You will be relegated to A-2.
  • You placed last (or second-to-last) in your C-4 Division (the lowest C division in your sub-region). You will stay in your division, since you can’t be relegated to a lower category.

Season 3 Changes

ZRL Season 1 and 2 saw very “loose” team structures, with teams not required to provide a set signup lists for their team members. This allowed teams to bring in “ringers” and swap riders out as much as they’d like, as long as the riders were within the proper category.

This relaxed approach to team structure was done to encourage participation, but it results in a neutered promotion/relegation process, since teams could bring in a completely new list of very strong riders, making their past performance a moot point.

WTRL assures us that, “Season 3 will see more restrictions on riders and multiple teams including pre-nominating a team.” This seems like a welcome change!

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

Extreme Dieting in Virtual Cycling, Part 1: Definition, Prevalence, and Esports

Editor’s note: this is the first in a 3-part series. Click to read part 2 and part 3.


Cycling is classified as a weight-sensitive sport, wherein high body weight restricts performance by making it more difficult to move against gravity.  Therefore, body weight and body composition are crucial performance variables. 

As a consequence, athletes with very low body weight, frequent weight fluctuation, and eating disorders are prevalent as the pressure to gain a competitive edge ever increases.1

Prevalence of Extreme Dieting

In an article published in the British Medical Journal it was determined that male elite athletes had as high as a 32.5% prevalence rate for extreme dieting and cited competing in weight-sensitive sports as the most frequently associated risk factor.2 Furthermore, a study published in the Journal of the American Dietary Association suggests that male cyclists often do not consume adequate nutrients to sustain their metabolic needs, do not know how to identify disordered eating habits, and are therefore at greater risk for eating disorders.3

In 2005 the International Olympic Committee, realizing an equal or greater health risk in women, convened an expert panel to create a consensus statement describing the issue.  The Female Athlete Triad was defined as the relationship between three interrelated components: energy availability, menstrual function (amenorrhea), and bone health.4

It was determined through scientific evidence that the factor most influential in the Triad is Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport.  The syndrome of RED-S, most commonly found in women, refers to impaired physical function including, but not limited to, metabolic rate, menstrual function, bone health, immunity, protein synthesis, and cardiovascular health caused by chronic energy deficiency.

A study of a sample of 4037 cyclists and triathletes from across Spain, published in The Journal of Eating Disorders, showed that 17.9% had a higher likelihood of suffering from an eating disorder.  Females and cyclists presented in a higher prevalence, suggesting that even in non-elite athletes, sport has an influence upon eating disorder risk.5

(For comparison, a systematic review meant to estimate the prevalence of eating disorders in the worldwide general population published in 2013 showed the estimated lifetime prevalence of any eating disorder was 1.01%. The estimated lifetime prevalence of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder was determined to be 0.21%. The estimated female-male ratio for lifetime prevalence of any eating disorder was 4.2.6)

The Extreme Dieting Continuum and Cycling

The range of abnormal eating patterns seen amongst competitive cyclists is described beginning with what is termed disordered eating (DE) and progresses in severity to clinical eating disorders (ED).  Disordered eating practices, which are found in 20% of female and 8% of male elite athletes, includes the use of short-term restrictive diets (<30kcal/kg per day).  The progression ends with clinical eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia, and binge disorder.  

Factors specific to cycling, such as dieting to enhance performance, overtraining, and certain regulations have been suggested as contributory to disordered eating.  The issue has gained international attention after the recent admission by pro cyclist Jani Brojkovic who stated, “the problem of eating disorders in the peloton is a major one.”  When describing his personal experience on his website, he stated “It’s about a poor relationship with food-disordered eating, which became an eating disorder, bulimia.” 

Not Only an In Real-Life Problem

Speaking under the cloak of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the issue, an elite Zwift racer who wishes to remain nameless informed me that the issue of extreme dieting is not exclusive to real-life competition:

“A protocol would include short-term starvation and dehydration before taking on just enough water and food to cover the event.  It isn’t against the rules, it is just a part of our sport,” he stated matter of factly.  He went on to say, “Training for six hours on a bowl of cereal, coming back, taking a sleeping pill, and sleeping until dinner is seen as normal, when it is far from it!

Although disordered eating and extreme dieting are definitely not the norm in Zwift racing, it is an existing health risk which can jeopardize the safety of athletes. Sound policies and practices must be instituted from the top down to mediate the risks, and healthy attitudes toward diet and conditioning should be regularly communicated and encouraged.

Contributing Factors for Virtual Cyclists

The health-related risks associated with abnormal dietary practices is not limited to the pro peloton, or even to real-life amature and professional cycling.  Esports and virtual cycling competition, through its nature and governance, creates a unique set of circumstances which pose as significant precursors to disordered eating practices and subsequent deleterious effects to athlete’s health and performance. 

The most significant factors are the Esports weigh-in procedure, the relative anonymity and seclusion of athlete performance, and extreme glorification of w/kg as speed determining metric.

Zwift’s weigh-in process for Cycling Esports Events is documented in their ruleset, which is freely available on their website at Zwift Cycling Esports Rules-Appendix A.  In short, the athlete, while clothed in their cycling kit, follows a basic scale calibration and rudimentary zeroing out process, then weighs themselves, all while a video of the process is taken with evidence of a valid time and date stamp.  The video is then uploaded privately to YouTube and the link is sent to the appropriate sanctioning body, which in the case of the Premier League goes directly to the Zwift Cycling Esports Commission.  Athletes can submit videos as early as 24 hours prior to the race.

Statement from Zwift’s Cycling Esports Commision

When asked to comment on the weigh-in procedure, Dr. George Gilbert, Chair of Zwift’s Cycling Esports Commision, wrote:   

The issues with both “body-shaming” and pressure to minimize weight for competitive advantage are very real, and apply to both real-life cycling as well as online.  Zwift is acutely aware of the impact the requirement to weigh-in for events could cause, and we have therefore already built a number of safeguards into our processes, for example:

  • The requirement that all weight videos for Zwift events are private.  This eliminates the incentive of “peer-pressure” where a group of riders who may be happy to publicly share their weight, try to pressurise others to also do so.
  • The requirement that all riders weigh-in before every race.  This eliminates the incentive of riders crash-dieting before the start of a series to weigh-in light, sitting out the first event while they recover, and then benefiting from their unrealistically low weight for the remaining races.
  • The requirement that all riders are appropriately, and similarly, clothed.  This eliminates the incentive for riders to strip down further to try and gain an advantage over their competitors.

We strongly believe that we are leading the industry in setting the right balance between transparency of rider data for the integrity and accuracy of racing, and the privacy and safety of riders in supplying it.

Follow-Up Inquiry

When asked these follow up questions:

  • As chair of the Zwift Cycling Esports Commission, what experience do you possess that provides you the knowledge required to make decisions with respect to rider safety and health?
  • With respect to the safeguards that you have put in place, was a medical professional who specializes in sports nutrition, disordered eating, and eating disorders consulted prior to creating and implementing the policy?
  • What clinical evidence or medical advice do you have proving that weigh-ins prior to each event eliminates the incentive to “crash diet?”

Dr. Gilbert replied:

The answer to all of your questions is broadly the same:

The need to weigh competitors is a long-established part of many sports where weight is a key factor in determining success-rowing and judo, to name just a few.  The rules and regulations for sports in this area are all backed by many decades of medical research, numerous high-quality peer reviewed scientific papers and sharing of experience and best-practice between these sports. Notably this includes the IOC Medical Commission, and their findings on this are available in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (Br J Sports Med.  2013 Nov; 47(16): 1012-22).

Dr. Gilbert references several other sports in his response, but many sports including collegiate and high school wrestling have undergone wholesale changes to reduce the prevalence of disordered eating in their athletes.  A more substantive response would have been welcomed from Dr. Gilbert, a Cambridge-educated scientist with over 25 years of experience in sports governance. But to his (and Zwift’s) credit, he did include the following:

Aside from the formal scientific literature however, from personal experience (as a former lightweight rower), I’ve been weighed and measured publicly, compared against my team-mates, and seen first-hand the pressures of team managers ordering people to lose weight – I truly get on a personal level, as well as professionally, what the issues and consequences are here. As a scientist, I also understand that scientific knowledge is constantly improving, and new approaches to balancing the needs of the integrity of the sport, and the needs of the athletes, are constantly being developed. Zwift is a new and rapidly evolving sport, and we are keen to remain at the forefront of best-practice – we are very open to feedback, and welcome any new evidence or suggestions for ways we can improve still further.

It is also worth mentioning that, while Dr. Gilbert chairs the Zwift Cycling Esports Commission, he is not a Zwift employee, and by his own admission he does not make unilateral policy decisions:

We have experts at Zwift in a wide range of subjects, with those with masters degrees in Physiology, Human Kinetics, Engineering, Physics, Computer Science etc – we also have coaches, former pro-cyclists and software developers who all feed into the Commission to ensure we have a comprehensive and balanced outlook on all matters. It is not a question of me making unilateral decisions based on my personal views, but about me bringing together the right experts with the right knowledge to make the right decisions collectively.

Extreme Dieting in Virtual Cycling is a Problem 

Having established the reasons why disordered eating is a serious issue affecting virtual cyclists, in the next installment of this article series I will be examining Zwift’s current Esports policy and where it falls short compared to the policies of other weight-sensitive sports. 

In addition, we’ll look at the circumstances which prompted those sports to make necessary changes for the safety of their athletes.

You Are Not Alone

If you feel you may have a disordered eating problem, or you just don’t know, you are not alone, nor is there any shame in admitting.  Contact the American National Eating Disorders Helpline for guidance and support.

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

Bibliography

  • Karrer, Yannis. “Disordered Eating and Eating Disorders in Male Elite Athletes: A Scoping Review.” British Medical Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-23.
  • Mountjoy, Margo. “The IOC Consensus Statement: Beyond the Female Athlete Triad-Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S).” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 48, 2014, pp. 491-497.
  • Muros, Jose. “Likelihood of Suffering From an Eating Disorder in a Sample of Spanish Cyclists and Triathletes.” Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 8, no. 70, 2020.
  • Quan, Jie. “Prevalence of eating disorders in the general population: a systematic review.” Shanghai Arch Psychiatry., vol. 25, no. 4, 2013, pp. 212-223.
  • Riebl, Shaun. “The Prevalence of Subclinical Eating Disorders Among Male Cyclists.” Journal of the American Dietary Society, vol. 107, no. 7, 2007, pp. 1214-7.
  • Sundgot-Borgen, Jorunn. “How to minimise the health risks to athletes who compete in weight-sensitive sports review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition, Health and Performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commission.” Br J Sports Med, vol. 2013 Nov;47(16):1012-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092966.

World of Zwift – Season 2, Episode 6

The latest episode of WOZ is out, covering all things great and beautiful in the world of Zwift racing.

In this episode, host OJ Borg brings us:

  • The latest news from the wide world of Zwift
  • A to Zwift with Rahsaan Bahati
  • ZRL Highlights (Premier Division) with Matt Stephens, plus race analysis with Dave Towle
  • Zwift Community Division racing news with Nathan Guerra
  • Rider Profile: Shayna Powless with Team Twenty24
  • Greatest London Flat route recon with Carlee Taylor from ZHQ

How the Best Teams Race Zwift TTTs – By the Numbers

11

My last video concentrated on the techniques and tools I use as a DS to try and help a team get their best result. 

Having made that video, I was curious to understand exactly what the top teams are actually doing every week, in terms of the effort they are putting in and how they organise themselves. This video is the result of my number crunching.

You can find all the information on how to practice these efforts for yourself at the end of the video. Full transcript below. Hope you enjoy! 🙂

In my last video on Zwift Team Time Trialling, I concentrated on the techniques and tools I use as a DS to try and help a team get their best result. 

Having made that video,  I was curious to understand exactly what the top teams are actually doing every week. 

Questions I had that don’t seem to have been answered before are:

  • What difference does team size make – 8 v 4?
  • How are the riders matched and is everyone doing the same during the race?
  • Just how much effort, how often, and for how long, are the top teams putting in during an event?

So, I decided to try and answer them for myself with some number crunching. 

The rest hopefully gives you some insight into team make up and effort levels required, based on the best. This applies regardless of your Coffee Class and are especially useful if you are a team that perhaps changes members every week, or who may not always have the chance to practice together to work out your own best plan involving more specific skills like picking riders for certain sections or deliberately ‘burning’ a rider. 

At the end I will also tell you how you can potentially train the efforts required, either solo or as a team. 

WATTS vs W/KG

Before I start though I want to revisit Watts vs Watts per kilogram. I regularly see conversations based on this topic and want to share my view. Now, I am sure there are dozens of teams who all agree with a W/kg target and stick to it. However, I maintain that this is not always the most effective way to plan a fast race.  Let me explain

Consider these two riders that could very easily be in the same Frappe team. If, as a team, 4.5w/kg is agreed on the front, when A is on the front, they are pulling 360W. crucially only 113% of FTP – which is not really hard enough, as we will see.

Meanwhile, Rider B is at 105%  at 3rd wheel, and at 113% in 2nd! – too much to maintain for the duration of the event – making their ability to contribute minimal and splits likely.

So let’s switch it around. 

Now, rider B is on the front at THEIR 4.5w/kg , which 293w or 122% FTP. This is just about hard enough for them, but not enough for a good time, given the other power available. Meanwhile, Rider A is only at 69% of FTP in 3rd wheel, which is all day pace. 

Whilst this is a VERY simplified example, you can see how a w/kg figure really doesn’t always make the best of the team. 

In this scenario, you are better off having Rider A sit at 320W (10% more than Rider B could hold for any length of time), leaving B in 3rd wheel or beyond, saving ~30% power to sit at 225W (or 94% of FTP). The difference in weight of 15kg, on the flat, will not make a discernible difference vs the loss in wattage if B goes on the front. 

That said, once the road rises at any more than 3%, a w/kg number to keep riders together is best. Then it may be entirely correct to agree on that figure of 4.5w/kg!

For all of the numbers that follow, I am using freely available data taken from a recent flat WTRL Thursday TTT. This negates the complication of teams splitting on the climbs and demonstrates how raw power as a squad is utilised in a purist’s Team Time Trial. 

It is well known that a group moves faster than a solo rider. Anyone who has had the horrible feeling of being just 2s off a group knows this fact. Recently, the excellent GP Lama did a test of group v solo,  showing some startling differences in terms of time for a given power. But, what about in the team time trial situation? 

There are not many teams of 4 to choose from in WTRL, that stayed together to the end, demonstrating evidence of taking turns on the front. 

There are also smaller teams who do very well but I wanted to find teams of 8 in the same Coffee Class, who produced similar race average watts, to see if there was any pattern in the results . Here are a few examples I found

Whilst this data may not take into account rider weight, this was a flat course, and the  coffee class used the same in each comparison. There is evidence that the 8 rider team, doing the same or similar interval efforts and with similar ability, beats the 4 rider team by around a minute on a flat course.  

If you want to do well in your class, then 8 equally matched riders really helps, so you can share the work evenly. Typically in the Doppio, this might be FTPs of 320 to 390, with an average around 360.  In the Vienna Espresso, the figure was generally 210-280,with an average of 245.

In the top teams, the spread of ability in terms of FTP was around 10% either side of the average, with very few riders falling too far out of this. Where there was a potentially weaker rider, with an FTP more than 15% below the team average, you should consider these riders doing very limited turns. Beyond 20% lower and they really just need to be in the draft, helping the group speed effect, as they are just not sufficiently powerful enough to lead. 

This is where my DS spreadsheet really helps to layout the capability available. It will also highlight who is well above the average and can do longer pulls! I have used this method effectively before, asking one of a team to ride threshold in draft for the duration, keeping the team as large as possible. 

The top teams (and way beyond) use a pace line, with remarkably similar 30s power surges above FTP and overall average race power compared to stated FTP, when expressed as a percentage.

Nothing new perhaps, but consistency is key. The more even and regular the turns, typically 20-30s, the faster the team. 

After a race, the best team’s amalgamated Companion apps traces tend to look like this. See how the peaks of effort follow each other smoothly, certainly early on, even if they get a little more ragged later. 

So, how much power are we talking in these intervals in reality? The video is about the very best teams, so the numbers generated are going to be out of the reach of many. But in case you are interested:

  • 30s pulls well over 300W are typical in the Vienna Espresso Top 5 
  • 500W for the best of the Doppio class

However, I was more interested in how did these numbers compare to the stated ability of the riders. As mentioned previously, Zwift Insider research of 4 riders, showed intervals 120% of FTP was needed on the front, for a group to beat their own FTP blob, whilst having a lower than FTP average for the race. 

However, all the top teams are easily surpassing this figure

  • In Vienna-Espresso the 30s power average was generally 130%+ above the Team’s average FTP
  • In the Doppio, this figure was as high as 143% 

Turns were usually around 30s, with then 3.5mins of comparative rest. 

This makes sense because if you have ever used TrainerRoad or Sufferfest, generally the Vo2 max workouts get you doing 120% of FTP for 2-3mins, which is taxing. So repeated efforts of ‘only’ 30s, should be doable at higher than this. Also similar across teams was the ‘Race Average’ power – typically, the average of each person was around 95% of their FTP. 

So what are my top tips for making sure you are really getting the best you can as a team?

  1. Rather than 45mins at 100%, teams are doing a set of overlapping ‘Over and Under intervals’ of anything from 85% up to 130% and beyond. 
  2. Have 8 riders, try and ensure those riders are evenly matched
  3. Use the spreadsheet and work out who can do what
  4. Pick a target power that is at least 120% of the team average – ideally 130%
  5. Check course notes (I have these at zwift-ds.com) to check where w/kg and blobbing would be better
  6. Really use the draft to get that rest at no less than about 85% in position 3+, 95-100% in position 2, as part of that set of Over/Under intervals,
  7. Practice and be consistent and metronomic in those 30s turns at 130%+

This kind of session is pretty unique, indoors or out, and there are not many training workouts that you can use… so I made some. You can find a link to a full workout, including Warm Up, that simulates what a Zwift TTT should feel like, at my website, along with a link to instructions on their use from Zwift and Zwift Insider.

If you really want to take your team results to the next level, you could download the 6-rider set of files, create a ‘Stay Together Meet-up’ and choose a file each for a rough simulation of how a Team Time Trial should look. It will allow the team to do a guided effort to see how hard they can go and practice the communication required before doing it for real. 

With that, thanks for reading!

Questions or Comments?

Share below!


Editor’s note: this article was originally published at zwift-ds.com, and is reposted here with permission from the author.

Eric Min Interview on Cycology.fm Podcast

30

Editor’s note: Zwift CEO and Co-Founder Eric Min was recently interviewed on the Cycology.fm podcast, and we’re sharing it here because Eric’s interviews are always an interesting listen as he discusses Zwift’s roots, current challenges, and future goals.

If you really want to understand where Zwift is going, this is an interview worth listening to. Host Rob Reed is a longtime Zwifter, but one whose Zwift experience has been quite narrow (no group rides, for example). His questions will resonate with many Zwifters, both veterans and newbies alike.

Interesting stats from Eric:

  • Over 3 million Zwift accounts have been created
  • 0.7% of Zwifters are at level 50
  • 25% of Zwifters are participating in group events
  • 75% of Zwifters are doing workouts

Key Points From This Episode:

  • The story of how Eric left the tech finance world and founded Zwift with his partners.
  • The landscape of the indoor cycling world at the time of Zwift’s conception.
  • Zwift’s service of combining fitness, gaming, and community.
  • Opportunities as far as appealing to a cycling industry beyond road cycling.
  • Some of the main challenges to adopting Zwift and how it differs from Peloton.
  • Features and elements of gamification in Zwift and how it differs from a simulator.
  • The capital Zwift has raised and the resources that go into building new ‘worlds’.
  • The line between building new worlds and keeping them filled with participants.
  • Moments when it is better to ride maps in the game with fewer people.
  • Ways to optimize Zwift by adding additional controls and hardware.
  • How Zwift is integrating into and influencing brands like Peloton, Rapha, and Strava.
  • The evolution of the indoor cycling world and how the industry is catering to it.
  • How regulations are enforced for Zwift races through the Zwift Power platform.
  • Eric’s philosophy toward outdoor cycling and what types of routes he’ll still ride.
  • Metrics for Zwift’s growth in users and the limitations hardware poses to further expansion.
  • Leveling up in Zwift and the users who are using the platform competitively.

Tweetables:

“This is really early days in terms of connected fitness devices in every home.” — @werkdodger [0:11:00]

“If you want to combine fitness and gaming, where you can exercise with a community, which is global, that’s what Zwift is.”— @werkdodger [0:11:32]

“We certainly have the resources to have a team large enough to do a map every month, but I’m not sure that would serve the community well.” — @werkdodger [0:23:56]

I think the indoor cycling community has a pretty big voice going forward, for sure.” — @werkdodger [0:36:46]

UA HOVR Run the World Series Begins Monday

8

With an increasing number of quality running events launching on Zwift, I’ve purchased a Zwift Run Pod so I can participate. What better place to test it out than the Under Armour HOVR Series!

What is the Under Armour HOVR Series?

It’s a 5K running challenge where the purpose is to run a 5K in five different Zwift worlds: New York City, Paris, Richmond, London, and Innsbruck.

About the Under Armour HOVR

Under Armour HOVR is the next generation cushioning platform, built to make you better. It is engineered to provide the ideal combination of cushioning and energy return.  It is the brand’s latest innovation in footwear cushioning technology.

Are these group runs?

Yes, but they are not being held at a particular pace. Under Armour ambassadors will be leading select events.

Stage and Route Details

STAGE ONE – Starting MONDAY, MARCH 1

World: New York
Route: 6 Train
Distance: 3.1 mi // 5 km
Elevation: 200 ft // 61 m

STAGE TWO – Starting TUESDAY, MARCH 2

World: Paris
Route: Champs-Élysées
Distance: 3.1 mi // 5 km
Elevation: 112 ft // 34 m

STAGE THREE – Starting WEDNESDAY, MARCH 3

World: Richmond
Route: Fan Flats
Distance: 3.1 mi // 5 km
Elevation: 43 ft // 13 m

STAGE FOUR – Starting THURSDAY, MARCH 4

World: London
Route: Classique
Distance: 3.1 mi // 5 km
Elevation: 62 ft // 19 m

STAGE FIVE – FRIDAY, MARCH 5

World: Innsbruck
Route: Innsbruckring
Distance: 3.1 mi // 5 km
Elevation: 236 ft // 72 m

Prizes

Complete all five events to win one of six grand prizes or ten secondary prizes, including your very own pair of Under Armour HOVR™ Machina2 running shoes.

6x Grand Prize Winners will win:

  • 1x pair UA HOVR™ Machina2 running shoes
  • 1x UA Qualifier Singlet
  • 1x UA Qualifier Speedpocket 5′ Shorts
  • 2x UA Playmaker Crew Socks
  • 1x UA Undeniable Duffle 4.0 Large Duffle Bag
  • 1x UA Launch Run Cap

10x Secondary Prize Winners will win 1x pair UA HOVR™ Machina2 running shoes.

See terms and conditions for details >

Unlocks

Cross the finish lines in Stage 2 and Stage 5 to unlock the in-game UA Kit and HOVR Running Shoes, respectively.

Hilly Both Ways – Tips for WTRL TTT #98 – Watopia Figure 8

2

Since last March I have become obsessed with the weekly Team Time Trial… so I asked Eric if i could share my obsession with you all, in weekly doses.

Each week I will give you a profile of the upcoming route, guidance on bike choice, and some target times if you want to aim for the Premiere League (top-10 in each coffee class get to be in a special race televised on YouTube). 

If you can’t ride (or even if you can ride, but want more action) don’t forget to tune in to the live TV show on Zwift Community Live’s YouTube Channel at 6:15 (UK time). I am working through the glitches on my nascent livestreaming attempt so if you want to watch my TTT you can do that on YouTube here

Astoria Line 8 recap

This course has been run three times before; last time September (I missed this one), before that was April (#53, my second TTT), and the first time i found was August 2019. 

Across the board the top teams in each category are getting faster… is this tactics, is this fitness… I don’t know. There is certainly a strong debate in Facebookworld around the tactics used by the faster teams. While I am not qualified to get into all that – I do know that the small team at WTRL are hamstrung by Zwift live data crumbling. Anyone who wants to help improve the overall competitiveness and fairness of the TTT should pop over to the Zwift Forum and add a comment of support

#53#74PredictionPL-timeHow did I do?
Vienna53:5055:1453:4551:27Simply awful
Doppio45:5248:24 45:3045:2215th
Espresso47:0647:1546:3045:5720th
Frappe48:3248:3048:0047:4716th
Latte52:5752:3852:0051:1116th
Mocha1:01:551:00:0659:0059:219th

Wow that was awful! This past week I managed Uber Pretzel in 4:50 – significantly faster than my goal, and won a 30km race in C-Cat twice over Fox Hill. But today I died after one lap. Not one of those “need to take a few seconds then limp home” deaths, but a “complete failure and inability to pedal” ignominious demise. Ah well… I will let the ever amazing bard Trigg explain it all…

We waited nervously, listening for signs of Big Ben, who’d been on the tracks homeward from Newcastle since 2pm, it would be tight. Suddenly we saw smoke in the distance and then the chuffing sounds of our Titan as he pulled into the station. Just in time! The sweaty scene was set. All 8 players were off. The pre-race briefing was clear, riders should perish on the road to  glory if necessary.  Sentimentality is for football players (soccer to our American brethren).

This was a course for puncheurs and we had Smokin’ Ben laying us out on the canvas from the bell. Shifty laid to rest last week’s ghost, but not for long… like many a new player before him, he was poleaxed by one of the early surges. We pressed on behind Ben, with Andy giving strong support throughout. Over the first lap we passed two teams and a host of stragglers. Suddenly Sherpa was hit by an avalanche of lactic, and tumbled from his saddle just as we passed a third team. We pressed on, occasionally pointing out the gaps, answered immediately by an easing of the tectonic forces threatening to tear us apart. Sue the stayer; slayer of B-cat men was never in trouble. Simon fought cleverly to stay in the group of 5 which finished with Ben and Andy in the vanguard. Another great evening with the R&K ladies and gents.

I live to fight again next week, avoiding demotion but not avoiding shame. By next Thursday I will have worked out the kinks in my livestream too (5 frames per minute is more of a slide show than a video, but it looks sorted now). We will lose Ben next week as he moves onward and upward in the R&K ranks, but glory-be, we get Gaby back after a couple of weeks. Now Shifty knows what he has in store. I expect great things, as does WTRL as we have suddenly and accidentally become a Frappe team! 

I promised you some stories from around the TTT world… and here is what Bianca Fernandez-Clark had to say about her ride with Giant Camden Mad Jalapenos this week

No, we weren’t that fast… but my report is loosely based on the 20 mins I managed to stay with the super strong ladies in Mad Jalapenos, and the rest of what I could hear on Discord.

Before we delve into that, it’s worth mentioning that the UK has a “roadmap” to end the lockdown (by roadmap I mean, nothing is really happening for ages yet but we aren’t nothing if not hopeful) and the first one who’s decided it’s time to be out there is the Sun – so, with the rarity that it is sunshine in the UK, riders have had the audacity of going outdoors, making us believe they’re on Zwift with zwiftirl.com and making us team managers scramble last minute mergers and screw up team tags (sorry WTRL!) to accommodate for the deficit. All will be normal soon, can’t trust it to be good weather for long in this country.

Back to the race – in the pen early seeing if my ghosting issues (KICKR bike related) were solved, yes they were! Unfortunately, the legs remained invisible to push up those little nasty climbs! I did a Luciano and declared today to be the International Day of Numbers Not Making Sense. Not helped by our team being joined by a lone rider who not only did not know it was a TTT event, she was determined with passion to ride with us, which disrupted the line and caught a few of us on the wrong side of the gaps.

NOTHING in the scale of the universe is larger than a 2 second gap in New York. So I had to let the team go as we had already hemorrhaged many precious minutes trying to get rid of S.S., our uncooperative impromptu team member.

The ladies kept hammering it down though and in between turns all I could hear was a lot of gasping from all of them so a massive effort and finishing in a solid sub 60 mins – sneaking in to the PL for next week! Well done team!

Thursday 24th September – Watopia Figure 8

Back to Watopia next week for a single lap of Watopia Figure 8. This is the first time the TTT has been run on this course as far as I can tell, which is surprising because it’s a great route. 

Both ways through the Hilly KOM, both ways through the Esses and twice under the Sea gives the route plenty of technical hills but also enough flat to get the team settled. At a touch under 30km this will be a 40-50 minute effort for most teams. 

Starting in the downtown pier, you head down Ocean Boulevard and under the sea for a nice flat warmup covering the first 3.25 km. From there head up out of the tunnel, past the fishing village and take the gentle snaking climb up the hill. At the junction (6km) veer right and head up the Hill KOM reverse. Down the other side, through the start/finish gate and up to the Esses before heading back down the other side and through the sprint (reverse). You are now 14km in to the ride… almost halfway. 

Up through the Italian Villas to the top of the little hill snake back down the other side through the Fishing Village and back into the tunnels. When you head back towards downtown, swing left to the Hilly KOM forward. Crest the KOM and the hard stuff is over… you are now 25km done. 

From here it’s down the reverse Hilly, through the Italian Village and back to the Sprint – forward this time. Through the Esses and down the hill through the start/finish gate. 

Usually at this point I’d show the cool Veloviewer 3d route map… but because this route heads forward and backward on the same roads that didn’t look good – so here is the map-view of the same thing. 

What to ride?

This is another course with enough rolling hills that the Tron pips the Venge/Super9 combo. So if you have Tron available to you, use it this week. If you don’t have Tron here are the recommendations for different levels.

  • Level 5 Specialized SL7 with ENVE 3.4 (just like last week I favor the ENVEs over the Rovals – but its pretty close)
  • Level 13 Canyon Aeroad 2021 with ZIPP 808s
  • Level 33 S-Works Venge with ENVE SES 8.9
  • Level 40 S-Works Venge with Zipp 858
  • Level 45 get those 858/Super 9 wheels and pair them with the S-Works Venge
  • If at any point in this journey you get the Tron… pick that for this course.

As always, the Zwift Insider reports on frames and wheels are superlative so if you want to find the perfect bike and wheel combo for you, check them out. 

Every week i give the same message about the Tron… which can be summarized as “get it”. Last week I told you about Team Giant Camden’s upcoming series of group rides. Team Giant Camden is putting on a series of 4 (to start with) Tron Hunter events – the first is March 7th and they will be weekly from there. The routes are hand-picked to have enough ascent to be useful, but not to be just another grind. London Surrey Hills on March 7th, New York Rising Empires on the 14th, Ven-Top on the 21st, and finishing with Royal Pump Room 8 in Yorkshire. 

We still don’t have links to the events yet but as soon as I do I will post them in the recce. Team Giant Camden are well known for being a friendly lot and while they are based out of a bike shop in London, they have 200+ racers from all over the world with a very strong female contingent. The Tron Hunter rides are open to all… see you there!

Route recon

If you haven’t raced the Figure 8 in a while get out there and while you are there think about the TTT dynamic – especially the impact of the Esses which will stretch the team and the KOM itself which might break the weaker team members. 

There are a few rides to choose from this week – check out the event listing on zwifthacks.com. That said, if you want to create your own meetup  or just ride this route, it is really easy! 

  • Hop on to Zwift, select Figure 8 in Watopia.
  • Create a Meetup and invite the team… or just a few friends

What to look out for on the ride

The ride starts with a nice flat intro. Use those first kilometers to get sorted before heading out of the tunnels.

Fishing Village to the top of the reverse KOM

Once you come out of the tunnels the ride starts to get a little technical. First the gravel section and false flat snaking up the hill, then the Reverse Hilly KOM. 

By the numbers the reverse KOM barely exists – it’s 1.8% for 2.5km. False-flat, right? Well, the truth is we have four ramps separated by easier segments and even some downhill, rendering those numbers meaningless. Why is this a problem for the TTT team? In a large group race you have a big group to hide in, and as the groups split up you still have plenty of protection. In a TTT you have only (up to) to 8-team members to hold together – when the hill bites each team member will be impacted differently. 

What to look out for here?

  • Stronger members leaving the team behind. This is not a time for a solo break.
  • Weaker team members being left behind. Particularly on the first ramp – at over 10% someone will crack if you go at race-pace.

If you come over the top together you’re in luck – gather momentum on the descent and there is even an opportunity to supertuck for a few seconds – just look out for the flatter section around the bend where your supertuck might break. Stay together here and power through the start/finish gate. 

Through the Esses 

From the start/finish gate we run up the hill and through the Esses. Work hard here to stay together – don’t let the undulating Esses throw off your group work. Keep momentum, and use the Esses to build momentum.

From the end of the bridge (where the sprint finishes), up through the Italian Villas is a pretty steady rise. Then it is a steady decline into the Fishing Village and through the tunnels. A good time to regroup and take stock. Nothing exciting to see in this middle section.

Hilly KOM Forward

You will climb the Hilly KOM with tired legs. There isn’t a lot I can give you for advice here – gather your wits, gird your loins, and grit your teeth! Get your four best riders up and over together because you’re almost home. Just under a kilometer in length, the climb comes in four distinct parts – how much you feel the distinction will depend on how tired you are.

  1. The first 400m is steep, averaging 7% but up to 10%
  2. It flattens for 50m as you round the bend then
  3. Tightens back up to 6% again for 300m then
  4. Eases to 2-3% for the remainder of the climb

Talk about how you will handle this among the team – but make sure you keep your finish-team together.

The rest is easy enough – down to the Italian Villas, through the Esses, and down the hill, finishing on a downhill. 

Wrap up

I am amazed this is the first TTT on the Figure 8 course – it looks perfect. Enough with the rolling hills of the past few weeks – this is a nice balance of the two KOMs and enough flat to get the speeds up!

Lucianotes: Chasing the Tron Bike

Yesterday during the post-race debrief, one of my teammates mentioned that those owning the Tron bike had a clear advantage over the others in this race.

It reminded me that one of the major quests in Zwift is to get the Tron bike, unlocking when you reach 50,000 meters elevation gain. It reminded me also of my journey to get it.

Spoiler alert: yes it is good looking, but the thing does not even show when you are drafting.

I was progressing regularly towards the 50km goal. I was not asking those who already had the Tron bike any questions because the only question I had was such a silly one I was embarrassed to ask: I hate yellow. I was terrified of the idea that you are automatically assigned a Tron bike of a certain color that you cannot change and mine would be yellow.

27km elevation down the line, during a social ride, a teammate explains on Discord that he is super upset since he reached 50km elevation but the Tron bike did not unlock. That he wrote to Zwift support to get it solved but did not get an answer yet. He was counting on getting the Tron for the following race, what a disgrace…

That’s when another participant to the channel asks him if he has activated the Everest challenge on the menu page.

The guy says what the heck is the Everest challenge?

You need to activate it otherwise the elevation does not count.

Obviously the first guy, at this very same moment, was very close to triggering the Japanese seppuku ritual to end his life while looking at the sunset from the antenna tower on the top of the Watopia Epic KOM.

And you have no choice but to make fun of him. How dumb is he, right? He did not activate the Everest challenge… how dumb, right?

For a second you are just in denial. You try as hard as you can to create a parallel universe, an alternate reality in which four months ago, the first day you joined Zwift, you activated the Everest challenge.

But your neurons are rather efficient at connecting to the fact that you did not…. yes my friend. You did not activate the Everest challenge either. So your hard-earned 27km elevation count for nothing, rien in French, nada in Spanish, zero in the three languages…

Despite the universal truth hitting you back, desperately you run to log on Zwift praying that your niece, one day while trying to launch Netflix on your device, mistakenly entered Zwift and has activated the challenge. For sure it is a possibility. I would even say it is very probable that this occurred. More crazy things have happened to you in life than an 11 year old girl guessing by mistake and in the first attempt your 16-bit encrypted password then activating the one amongst several challenges which would make your 27km count.

This should have also happened metaphysically, in the first sense of the word, meaning without any physical contact, since your niece was confined in her place and you were confined in yours for the last five months.

You login and go to the Everest challenge, it says 0m elevation. The End. Game over.

Your entire life is ruined. Nothing could ever make sense again. You feel the same way you felt the day you forgot your Woody and Buzz Lightyear action figures in the park and never saw them again.

Life will never ever be the same. You curse for three hours and swear you will never ever make a single meter of elevation again.

One week later, in the bottom of your heart, a little sparkle starts to grow into a flame. You never ever surrendered. It will not be the case with the Tron Bike!!! The reputation of your entire family name goes into it!

You log into Zwift, activate the Everest Challenge and a few months and thousand kilometers later BANG!!!!!! Your Tron bike is unlocked.

You immediately open the garage and equip, go back and check which map is most crowded at the moment in order to showcase at least 50,000 others your brand-new Tron bike customized in shining blue. You expect a rain of Ride Ons which will never come. But you don’t care, for a day you are the king of the world.

PS: whenever there is a new guy on Zwift mentioning his quest to get the Tron bike, I make sure I never tell him about the Everest Challenge activation thingy. There is not a single reason in the world why I should have been screwed and others are not. 😜

Debunking ANT+ Myths and Experimenting with USB Stick Placement

55

Much has already been written about reducing ANT+ interference, including this Zwift Insider article. Conventional wisdom and many forum and Facebook user groups advocate placing your ANT+ dongle close to the trainer. Others are adamant that a powered USB hub is the only answer.

USB Port and Power Draw

There are also numerous suggestions on the ‘net that your USB port needs to deliver 500ma to prevent dropouts. So I decided to look into that! Using the free version of USBDeview from nirsoft.net, I noted that although my ports can deliver 500mA, neither of my two ANT+ devices ever draw more than 100mA.

I plugged the ant+ stick into the port shown below as delivering 500mA to a webcam and the power dropped to 100mA on that port.

I checked this with a very well respected Zwift PC guru who gets very clean ANT+ signals and he confirmed the same on his ports.

As a third test, Eric (Zwift Insider editor) ran the test on his own system. Same results – all ANT+ sticks were drawing 100mA:

A sample size of only three, but seems pretty solid evidence that 100mA draw is absolutely fine.

ANT+ Dongle Positioning

Next, it was time to try a number of varying positions for my ANT+ adapters. The results were surprising!

The dongles used in these tests were the Anself USB ANT+ stick and Garmin USB ANT+ stick (see Recommended ANT+ Sticks for Zwift).

The four positions I tried are shown in the picture below. All analysis was done with the excellent Zwiftalizer – The Logfile Analyzer for Zwift. Ideally, we want zero searches and as few avg rxfails as possible.

Directly into the PC – Position 1

First off I plugged one ANT+ adapter directly into the PC. As expected this gave the worst results as the PC is in front of my bike. Although not dreadful, there were 5 times that the devices tried to repair, and over 51% fails.

Under the trainer – Position 2

I next tried to position the stick just under the KICKR v5.

The Garmin had less searches than the Anself, but more fails. All tests were done in the same position, same USB port, and same extension cable.

Under the bottom bracket – Position 3

Moving the dingles forward seemed to improve things a little, still with one search for the KICKR but less Avg fails:

Under the front wheel – Position 4

Since moving the adapter forwards improved the signal, I took it even further forwards and placed it just under the front wheel. So further away from the KICKR, but this got the best results yet!

The Garmin doesn’t perform as well as the Anself in this position, which is strange as the pedals are very close to the ant+ adapter now.

Powered USB Hub (Position 4)

ANT+ Adapter raised off the floor

I also raised the Ansell off the floor in Position 4, and looped it over a cardboard box (to try and minimise any further interference. This actually made the signal worse for me.

Summary Table and Conclusions

Here is a summary including the averaging of the searches and RXfails for each adapter in each of the 4 positions. It’s clear that position 4 gets the lowest avg fails and searches for the Anself, whereas the Garmin appears to prefer position 3. It is also interesting, that for me, the powered USB hub made no huge improvement to a quality shielded USB extension cable placed in the appropriate position.

It’s also interesting to note that the Anself performs better than the Garmin in terms of avg fails, despite being less than half the price! (See them on Amazon here: Anself USB ANT+ stick / Garmin USB ANT+ stick).

In large group rides

I tried position 4 with the Anself in a Tour De Zwift catchup ride with 250+ people and I’m confident that it’s the best position now for me.

Note: the Wahoo KICKR doesn’t have the ability to turn off the standard ANT+ unlike the Tacx NEO, so the dual ANT and FEC creating the small interference troughs shown at regular intervals.

I hope this helps you in your quest to get a rock-solid ANT+ signal to your PC!

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

A trip to the countryside for my birthday – Tips for ZRL Race 8 – Greatest London Flat TTT

2

This week for the final regular-season race of Zwift Racing League Season 2 we have another TTT, and the route is the Greatest London Flat – around the City of London itself, then over to Surrey with the flattest of the three paths through. Two little things to remember:

  • This isn’t the Greater London Flat, it’s the GREATEST London Flat – this takes a wide loop around London heading south of the river, and into Surrey.
  • It starts and ends at The Mall, not at the Start/Finish banner on Upper Thames Street… remember to add the extra 7km to your ride as you sail past! 

What to ride?

Venge + Disc

This is almost as flat as the route name implies, so aero rules. If you have it, the Specialized S-Works Venge with Zipp 858/Super 9 wheels is the pick of the bunch (and the only frame/wheel combo to beat Tron on the flat). Tron is almost as good on this course, and if you haven’t done it yet – kick off the Everest Challenge and start the long painful climb to get Tron.

Once you kick that off – look out for the upcoming Tron Hunter series from Team Giant Camden. Team Giant Camden are putting on a series of 4 (to start with) Tron Hunter events – the first is March 7th and they will be weekly from there. The routes are hand-picked to have enough ascent to be useful, but not to be just another grind. London Surrey Hills on March 7th, New York Rising Empires on the 14th, Ven-Top on the 21st, and finishing with Royal Pump Room 8 in Yorkshire. 

I don’t have links to the events yet but as soon as I do I will post them in the recce. Team Giant Camden are well-known for being a friendly lot and while they are based out of a bike shop in London, they have 200+ racers from all over the world with a very strong female contingent. The Tron Hunter rides are open to all… see you there!

If you don’t have either of those two setups, read Fastest Bikes at Each Level for guidance on picking your TTT rig.

Course Preview from Rick at No Breakaways:

Route recon

This is a single lap race. Starting at the pens it’s mostly slight rollers to Northumberland Avenue, where you head up the hill to Trafalgar Square. Sharp left at the top and then a right as you head towards Buckingham Palace and then down the Mall to the reverse sprint.

You are now 7.5km into the ride, and this is where the lap actually starts. The jaunt around Central London is mostly flat/false-flat, except when you head down Piccadilly through the Hyde Park Corner underpass and up the other side. Soon enough (17.5km) you will head across the river to Surrey – but fear not, you aren’t tacking Box or Leith, you are just heading through the beautiful Surrey parkland.

Through the Underground Station and across Tower Bridge (23.5km) and you’re soon on familiar ground – because you’ll pass the Pens and be back on the lead-in with 7.5km to go. Just follow Upper Thames Street, up the Northumberland Avenue hill to Trafalgar, left, right, past Buck House and a quick Reverse Sprint to cross the line.

There are loads of rides on this route if you want a proper recce. Check out zwifthacks.com. I struggled to find many times that would suit our American friends, but the Europeans and Antipodeans have quite a few choices.

My picks for recce rides this weekend come from Team CLS, who have two rides on Saturday – one for the European early birds and another for the Americans and European afternooners.

What to look out for on the ride

Unlike last week, this is all paved road surface. No significant hills to split the group, but there are a few areas to watch out for: 

  • From the pens it is a flattish start allowing you to get into formation and go… 3.7km into the ride you make a sharp turn onto Northumberland Avenue – that’s a 150m stretch at 4% – keep the weight-weenies in check and you’ll be fine.
  • Just past the 11km mark you will head down Piccadilly (1.1km where you will pick up speed) into the underpass and back up the other side (where you will lose it again). The incline out of the underpass shouldn’t split the group but keep an eye on your teammates. 
  • At 18km you hit what I think of as the worst part of the course… legs are starting to get worn, and there’s a 3km stretch of just annoying ramps. Can’t describe it better than that… annoying and just in the right place to create a split.
  • Right before 23km you exit the Tube station – it a short, sharp shock peaking at 15%. This will hurt.
  • Once more down the lead-in, with the main lump being Northumberland Avenue again
  • No time to look, but you’ll see Nelson’s Column, Big Ben, and Buckingham Palace again then SPRINT for the line with whoever’s left in the group.

Ride summary

This is the last ride for season 2 outside playoffs, and a great route to showcase your TTT skills. Have fun out there!