Home Blog Page 305

First Look: Completing a Zwift Academy 2021 Baseline Ride

First Look: Completing a Zwift Academy 2021 Baseline Ride

Yesterday I jumped into the first scheduled Zwift Academy Road Baseline Ride, scheduled for 11am PDT. Completing a Baseline Ride is a requirement for ZA graduation, so I wanted to get this out of the way quickly. But I was also super curious about the ride itself.

Intro to Baseline/Finish Line Rides

This year’s ZA program includes a required Baseline and Finish Line ride. The idea here is to test your fitness over three different intervals:

  • Sprint
  • VO2
  • Threshold

Riders will do that by hitting particular timed segments during the ride at maximum effort. Then you should ease up between the segments to recover as fully as possible so you can hit the next segment hard.

Baseline Rides are only available as group rides, and they are scheduled every other hour through September 27th. That’s over 320 time slots as of the publish date of this post, so you have plenty of chances to get your Baseline Ride in – or even do it more than once if you’d like.

Standard or Advanced?

Riders have two options for these rides: a “standard” route, or the “advanced” one. I chose the “standard” Baseline Ride option (category C), which uses the new Legends and Lava route. The big difference between the standard and advanced option is the threshold effort: standard uses the Volcano KOM, while the advanced version is held on the “Climber’s Gambit” route which uses the longer Epic KOM.

For me, the Volcano KOM takes around 8 minutes at max effort, while the Epic KOM is more like 22 minutes. With a Zwift Classics race the next day, I opted for the shorter effort, hoping it wouldn’t burn up my legs too much.

I knew the route details, but there was a lot I didn’t know going into this ride:

  • Would the UI be different from a typical group ride? Would we see messages with instructions, or custom leader/results boards, etc?
  • Would we all be on the same bike/wheels?
  • Would drafting be enabled?
  • What would the results screens in Zwift Companion look like?

Poking around on ZwiftHacks and popping into the start pens early answered a few of my questions:

  • Drafting is disabled
  • Bike selection: you can pick whatever bike you’d like, including a TT bike if you’re so inclined

A Word About Bike Choice

I selected the Specialized Venge S-Works frame and Zipp 858 wheels as my virtual rig for this ride. I’ve done a lot of riding with these, and figured all that matters is I use the same frame and wheels for my Baseline and Finish Line rides.

That’s something riders should be clear on: use the same frame and wheels for both rides, otherwise your times for the rides won’t be an apples-to-apples comparison.

It would get especially bad if you chose a TT rig for one ride, and a standard road race setup for another. That would really throw the numbers off.

Segment 1: Titans Grove KOM

Soon enough the timer hit zero, and we were off, with over 550 riders in my group! A good number jumped off the front early, for reasons I can’t explain. But I just spun my legs in zone 2, chatting with friendly Zwifters and making my way through Titans Grove toward the first segment.

This first segment is one I’ve actually enjoyed attacking a few times in the past. It’s one of the rare KOMs whose leader’s jersey I’ve actually worn!

I knew that an all-out effort would see me finishing in under 2 minutes, so that’s what I paced myself for. It was a real adrenaline rush to be hammering out watts and passing a lot of the riders who had jumped off the front. As the road flattened a bit near the top and the KOM banner came into sight I shifted, got out of the saddle, and went all-in for the final seconds. The leaderboard popped up as I crossed the line, showing me in 4th place with a 1:44.6 time. I’ll take that!

It was nice to just spin the legs out after that first effort. I’m so used to Zwift races where you have to hammer on the climbs, then keep the effort up afterward. The change of pace and unhurried feel of things was very welcome.

1:45, 466W average

Segment 2: Watopia Sprint Forward

Next up was the sprint segment. Honestly, I wish Zwift had picked a shorter segment to test peak sprint power, as the Watopia Forward sprint is one of the longer ones in the game – so long that I can’t actually push peak power for the duration, because I’ll blow up before the line.

According to Strava, I’ve completed this segment over 530 times. Wow! One thing I’ve learned after all that practice is that getting a fast time on this segment requires ramping up your watts while you’re still on the cobbles of the Italian Villas, so you enter the sprint at a high speed. That means you end up with a 10-15 second ramp up, plus a 20-25 second sprint. That’s a long “sprint” effort!

Anyway, I gave it all I had. I stayed seated, trying to keep my watts pretty even.

23 seconds, 692W average

PowerUps Enabled?

One fix Zwift probably needs to make to these rides is to disable PowerUps. They were enabled for my ride, and the problem I see with that is riders were using the PowerUps on the test segments.

This will artificially shorten a rider’s time, then when you do the Finish Line ride to test yourself on the same segment and don’t use the same PowerUp on the same section you won’t get that boost, and your time will be affected.

So here’s my simple advice: if PowerUps are enabled for your Baseline Ride, just ignore them and don’t activate them. Alternatively, you could “burn” them by using them outside of the timed segment, or using the option in Companion or in the action bar on screen to trash the PowerUp without using it.

Segment 3: Volcano KOM

The third and final segment was the one I was dreading the most. The Volcano KOM and I have never gotten along well, because it always feels a bit too long. Regardless, I wanted to give it my best shot. So as the start line approached I ramped up my speed, then tried to hold around 340W for the duration, making sure to bump the watts up a bit more on the steeper sections and ease off a bit on the flatter parts.

I felt I was able to keep my pacing fairly steady, and had just enough in the tank for a standing max effort on the final steepest pitch. I was the 59th rider over the line, and ranked #5 on the leaderboard.

8:07, 333W average

Oddly, the ride didn’t actually end at the KOM banner – it was a virtual finish line five hundred meters down the road. I’m not sure why Zwift set it up this way, but it’s no big deal, either. I just soft-pedaled my way to the finish, then kept soft-pedaling for another 15 minutes or so to make it an hour-long ride.

See my activity on Strava >

Watch the Ride Recording

I kept this recording silent, but if you want to see how the ride unfolded, including group banter, it’s all here!

Companion Results

New for this year, the results of the Baseline and Finish Line rides show in Zwift Companion. And our friends at ZwiftHQ tell me if you do multiple attempts, those different results will show as well. Here’s what the screens look like:

Tracking my times in Companion is a nice new feature, but data-loving zNerds like myself will immediately want more. The biggest thing I’m missing? Average power over the segment. I don’t really care about my segment time, in fact – power over a particular interval is a much more accurate gauge of fitness.

So why doesn’t Zwift show power?

I’m not sure. But my guess is the tracking of segment times is already built into the game/database, while the tracking of segment power is not. So this was a much easier solution to implement.

How’d I Do?

Some riders may find that they finish the Baseline Ride with more questions than answers. Me, for example: I finished the “Long” segment (Volcano KOM) in 8:07. What does that mean? Am I destined to be a star Time Trialist, or should I stick to sprinting?

Zwift’s text for each of the three segments in Companion ends with, “If you are strongest here, relative to the other segments, you fit the [ ] phenotype.”

But how do I know which segment I’m strongest in? The answer is: I don’t. And even if I take extra steps and look at my power numbers on Strava for the segments, that still doesn’t tell me my strengths or weaknesses.

Of course, I know there are other apps out there that will show me this info – like the Breakaway app I recently reviewed (which just received a Zwift integration update). Or XERT, which I have yet to review but whose metrics and methodology I find fascinating. ZwiftPower also profiles your power to help you understand your strengths and weaknesses.

But many Zwifters (especially n00bs) won’t have access to those tools or understand how to use them. My opinion: if Zwift could do a little more hand-holding by giving more guidance, especially to less-experienced riders, everyone wins.

Conclusions

Last year’s ZA introduced “Segment Rides”, where riders put in max efforts on two segments during the ride. This year’s Baseline and Finish Line rides are the next generation of that idea, with the segments more targeted at specific power systems and Companion integration tracking your efforts.

I just wish Zwift had developed the idea a bit more.

There’s so much Zwift could add to these segment rides to make them more engaging on the front end – like instructions for new users who don’t know when segments begin (there were plenty in the ride I joined), or progress bars on the segments so you know how much you’ve got left to do, or custom leaderboards that show how your efforts rank against other riders. And there’s so much that could be done after the ride to better educate riders and help them easily track training progress.

With all that said, I must add that I really enjoyed my Baseline Ride experience. It was a pleasant, chatty group of riders, and the hard efforts were difficult by not murderous. It was a fitness test that didn’t feel like a test, and that’s a good thing.

I’m curious to see what the Companion results look like after I complete the Finish Line ride at the end of ZA, and I’m hopeful that Zwift will keep developing and refining this idea for future events and training programs.

Your Comments

Have you tried a Baseline Ride yet? How’d it go? Share below!


Advice For Zwift Academy Road Workout 1 With Kristin Armstrong (Zwift PowerUp Cycling Podcast)

About this Episode

In this short “turbo” episode, Kristin Armstrong takes a look at the first workout of the Zwift Academy Road program and offers her advice on how to tackle it.

About the Podcast

The Zwift PowerUp Cycling Podcast features training tips from host Matt Rowe (Rowe & King), with regular co-hosts Greg Henderson, Rahsaan Bahati, Dani Rowe, and Kristin Armstrong.

World of Zwift – Episode 40

0

The latest episode of WoZ is out, covering all things great and beautiful in our favorite virtual world.

In this episode, host OJ Borg brings us:

All About Zwift’s New CADEX 42 and 65 Wheelsets

10

Zwift’s August update includes the first two wheelsets in-game from CADEX, a brand that may be unfamiliar to some cyclists even though it began in the 1980’s.

CADEX began in 1987 as a sub-brand of Giant group, with the goal of building a super lightweight, fully carbon-framed bike. This is commonplace nowadays, but back then, this was a moonshot project. And they did it!

The CADEX brand went dormant once that project wrapped up, but Giant brought it back in 2019 to develop more super-light pinnacle products including handlebars, tubeless tires, saddles, and of course wheels.

Zwifters now have access to the CADEX 42 and CADEX 65 wheelsets. Here’s how they’re described in the Drop Shop:

“The CADEX 42 is the choice on a day that could end in a sprint. Maximum versatility meets lightweight aero performance, featuring 42mm deep hookless rim design to maximize aerodynamics, weight, and durability, as well as low-friction hubs to maintain maximum power efficiency.”

“The CADEX 65 offers ultralight aero speed while remaining confident and stable under all conditions. With a 22.4mm rim width and hookless rim design, allowing a smaller lighter tire to create a more aerodynamically efficient tire shape and a larger contact patch for more control.”

The CADEX 42 is rated 3 stars for aero and 3 for weight, priced at 227,200 Drops and available at level 8+. The CADEX 65 is rated 4 stars for aero and 3 for weight, priced at 241,400 Drops and available at level 21+. In real life the 42 is a super-light climbing wheelset, while the 65 is slightly heavier (+200 grams or so) and of course more aero.

Will the wheels perform on Zwift like they perform outdoors? There’s only one way to find out! So we fired up our testing rigs and ran both virtual wheelsets through their paces. Here’s what we learned…

Aero Performance

Not surprisingly, the CADEX 65 turns in a strong performance in our flat test, ranking in the 74th percentile in the universe of Zwift wheels. (The CADEX 42 ranks at 34%.)

The CADEX 65 wheels turn a time of 50:50.5 in our test, while the CADEX 42 wheels turn in a time of 51:09. By comparison, the fastest non-disc wheels (Zipp 858) clock in at 50:39 over our flat 34.6km test route (Tempus Fugit).

Climb Performance

This is where things get surprising.

Given the IRL CADEX wheels’ weight differential, one would expect the lighter 42 to climb faster than the 65. And yet, in multiple tests up Alpe du Zwift, the CADEX 65 comes in 1 second ahead of the CADEX 42!

The CADEX 65 wheels turn a time of 49:21 in our climbing test, while the CADEX 42 wheels turn in a time of 49:22. By comparison, the best climbing wheels (Lightweight Meilensteins or Roval Alpinist CLX) reach the top in 49:12.

Note: all test results above are from a 75kg, 183cm rider holding 300W steady using Zwift’s stock 32mm carbon wheelset.

Down the Rabbit Hole

We would expect the lighter 42 wheels to outclimb the 65, but that’s not what we’re seeing. Our hunch is that the climbing performance of these wheels is more of a Zwift equipment spec issue than a reflection of the wheels’ IRL performance. (Which is a shame, because the CADEX wheels have received some really solid reviews, like this one on the 42 from Bicycling and a glowing writeup on the 65 from CyclingWeekly.)

To make things even weirder, the older (and heavier) Giant SLR 0 wheelset on Zwift outclimbs the CADEX 65 (by just half a second), which also doesn’t make sense, given that the offering from CADEX is a much more premium wheel. The CADEX 65 is much more aero than the SLR 0, so there’s really no competition between two on Zwift. But it still seems as though the SLR 0 with its deep-dish rims is too light in Zwift.

Conclusions

With all that said: the new CADEX 65 wheelset is a really strong all-arounder. It ranks #3 in our combined percentile rankings chart, just behind the Zipp 454 and DT Swiss ARC 62 wheels. The DT Swiss wheels will probably remain popular, though, since they’re available at a very low level (6) for a cheap price (184,600 Drops). Zwift definitely threw a bone to new Zwifters when they released those DT Swiss hoops!

The CADEX 42 are solid climbers given their low level lock. But other climbing wheelsets are available in this range offering slightly better performance, including the ENVE 3.4 and DT Swiss ARC 62.

Given the standout performance of the CADEX 65 wheels on Zwift, we’ll be updating the following post soon:

Additionally, any time a new wheelset is released we add it to our Master List of Zwift Wheelsets and update the following:

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

Important note: this post contains speed test results for Zwift frames or wheels. These results may change over time, and a bike's performance relative to others may also change. We don't always revise posts when performance rankings change, but we do keep current, master versions of our speed test results which are always available. See the frame charts, wheel charts, and Tron vs Top Performers for current performance data.

All About Zwift’s New Van Rysel EDR CF Bike Frame

2

Zwift’s August 2021 update included a new bike frame: the Van Rysel EDR CF.

This is the first frame in Zwift from Van Rysel, which is a brand that may be unfamiliar to many. It’s an in-house brand from Decathlon sports which was launched in January 2019 (read the story here).

Here’s how the frame is described in the Zwift Drop Shop:

“EDR, which stands for EnDuRance, is the new line of bikes from Van Rysel dedicated to performance. But make no mistake, ‘endurance’ and ‘speed’ are not mutually exclusive! That is the challenge that the Van Rysel design team took up in creating this new line. EDR frames are the perfect answer for competitive riders looking for a bike that is as good in the mountains as it is on the bike paths. The perfect combination of rigidity, low weight, and comfort will allow you to leave your past records in the dust.”

The frame is rated 2 stars for aero and 3 for weight, placing it among the mid-tier frames in game. You’ll have to be level 12+ to purchase it in game, at a price of 326,600 Drops.

The Van Rysel EDR CF, IRL

Star ratings don’t tell the full story, though, since two frames with the same rating can turn in test times which vary by a significant margin. So we ran this frame through our standard tests to learn how it performs in Zwift.

Here’s everything you need to know about Zwift’s new Van Rysel EDR CF frame!

Aero Performance

The Van Rysel EDR CF turns in a flat test time well off the mark of Zwift’s fastest frames, placing it in the lower 20th percentile overall. Its time matches the Specialized Allez and new BMC Roadmachine.

It turns in a time of 51:34.5 on our test course (two laps of Tempus Fugit). By comparison, the Zwift Aero frame turns in a time of 51:25, and the fast road frame (Cervelo S5 2020) turns in a time of 51:11.

Climb Performance

The Van Rysel EDR CF turns in a climb test time which places it right around the 50th percentile in Zwift’s universe of frames. It comes in just 1 second faster than the Ridley Helium, and 1 second slower than the Giant TCR Advanced SL.

It turns in an Alpe du Zwift time of 49:20. By comparison, the current fastest climbing frame (Specialized Aethos) turns in a time of 48:49.

Note: all test results above are from a 75kg, 183cm rider holding 300W steady using Zwift’s stock 32mm carbon wheelset.

Conclusions

The Van Rysel EDR CF isn’t remarkable in terms of its Zwift performance, but we didn’t expect much given its low price and level requirement. It is a distinctive color, so if you want to stand out from the crowd in a group ride, or perhaps if you ride a Van Rysel IRL, you may just want to add it to your garage.

This frame has been added to our Master Zwift Frames List, and its test data will be added to the following posts which are updated whenever a new frame is added to the Drop Shop:

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

Important note: this post contains speed test results for Zwift frames or wheels. These results may change over time, and a bike's performance relative to others may also change. We don't always revise posts when performance rankings change, but we do keep current, master versions of our speed test results which are always available. See the frame charts, wheel charts, and Tron vs Top Performers for current performance data.

Notable Zwift Events for the Weekend of August 28-29

3

Without a lot of high-profile events going on this weekend, we decided to focus on good causes for our picks. Zwifters have always been an amazingly supportive bunch. Let’s keep up the good work and get out there to help in any way we can!

Vitality for UNICEF Ride Series

You may have read my post earlier in the week about this ride.

I am keen to highlight this because the Vitality Ride Series forms a part of Vitality’s ongoing commitment with UNICEF to donate over 1 million vaccines worldwide through 2022. The partnership is built on Vitality’s shared-value model where personal health brings about better outcomes for society and Vitality’s insurance partners as a whole – a model which can have more impact than a traditional donation-based model. This model aligns closely with Zwift’s own mission to make more people, more active, more often.

Multiple dates and times, see all upcoming >

Team Novo Nordisk Group Ride

In December 2012 Phil Southerland and Novo Nordisk came together to create Team Novo Nordisk based on a shared vision to inspire, educate and empower people around the world affected by diabetes. This is a one-hour ride led by top Team Novo Nordisk pro athletes.

Team Novo Nordisk is a global all-diabetes sports team of cyclists. For more information visit teamnovonordisk.com.

Sunday August 29 @ 8pm CEST/5pm BST/12pm EDT/9am PDT
Sign up at zwift.com/events/view/2145604

TeamPTz – Joaquim Agostinho Ride

This is a ride to honor Joaquim Agostinho, a top Portuguese cyclist who died in 1984 at the age of 41. He won stages in several Grand Tours, include 4 Stages in the Tour de France and 3 stages in the Vuelta a España.  Whenever you climb Alpe d’Huez, at turn 14 you can see the J.A. statue in honor of his victory.

Saturday August 28 @ 10am CEST/9am BST/4am EDT
Sign up at zwift.com/events/view/2257991

Bikes for the Philippines Fun Race

This race is brought to you by Zwift Philippines riders to help draw attention to Bikes for the Philippines, a non-profit foundation that provides donated/used bicycles to deserving underprivileged students in the Philippines.

Saturday August 28 @ 7:30am CEST/6:30am BST/Friday 10:30pm PDT
Sign up at zwift.com/events/view/2257967

Ride to End ALZ Summer Challenge

This is “a cycling event that fights dementia”. Cyclists around the country are joining together virtually on August 29 to ride indoor and outdoor routes that fuel cutting-edge dementia research efforts. Grab your bike and ride along!

For more information on the Ride to End ALZ visit alz.org/ride.

Fundraising is encouraged, but not required to participate. Register, donate, and create a personal fundraising page >

Sunday, August 29 @ 3:30pm BST/2:30pm BST/9:30am EDT/6:30am PDT
Sign up at zwift.com/events/view/2256104

Your Thoughts

Got other events that stand out this weekend? Share below in the comments!

All About Zwift’s New Scott Addict RC Frame

21

Zwift’s newest update includes a new bike frame: the Addict RC from Scott.

Scott already had a handful of frames in game: the Plasma (TT), the Foil (aero racer), and the Spark RC (MTB). The Addict RC adds a mature all-around road racer to the mix, as the Addict RC is lightweight while maintaining strong aero performance.

Here’s how the new Addict RC is described in the Zwift Drop Shop:

“Since its introduction in 2008, the Addict RC has been one of the most successful competitive road bikes on the market. The new Addict RC is as complete as it can get when it comes to the perfect high-performance road bike. Regardless of whether you’re trying to win the biggest races on the planet, chasing a virtual segment, or taking on your riding buddies on your local climb, the Addict RC makes it more likely that you will come out on top.”

The frame is rated 3 stars for aero and 4 for weight on Zwift, indicating that it will be a strong all-arounder. You’ll have to be level 33+ to purchase it in game, at a price of 852,000 Drops.

The Scott Addict RC, IRL

Over the years, the Addict RC has certainly been used to win plenty of big pro races, including Simon Yates Vuelta a Espana victory in 2018. But IRL performance doesn’t always map directly to Zwift performance, so we ran this frame through our standard tests to learn how it performs in Zwift. And the results were noteworthy!

Here’s everything you need to know about the new Scott Addict RC in Zwift.

Aero Performance

The Addict RC turns in a flat test time just 1 second slower than the new best all-arounder (Pinarello Dogma F) which was released last month, placing it in the 81st percentile in terms of aero performance.

The Addict RC’s flat test time is 51:22.5. By comparison, the fastest frame in game (Cervelo S5 2020) turns in a time of 51:11. (Our test course is two laps of Tempus Fugit, which totals 34.6km.)

Climb Performance

When the road tilts upward, the Scott Addict RC really shines. It turns in an Alpe du Zwift climb time 4 seconds faster than the Pinarello Dogma F, placing it in the 97th percentile for climbing frames in game. It is only bested on the Alpe by the Specialized Aethos!

The Addict RC climbs Alpe du Zwift in a time of 48:55. By comparison, the standard Zwift aero frame turns in a time of 49:31, and the Specialized Aethos completes the test is 48:49.

Note: all test results above are from a 75kg, 183cm rider holding 300W steady using Zwift’s stock 32mm carbon wheelset.

Top All-Arounder

The Pinarello Dogma F was announced as the new top all-arounder when it was released in Zwift last month. But since the Scott Addict RC loses 1 second to the Dogma F on the flats while gaining 4 seconds on the climbs, we’re going to say the Addict RC is the new top all-arounder in game, because it delivers incredible performance where it’s needed most in many races (the climbs).

Tron-Killer?

Astute racers will be asking if the Addict RC will finally unseat the Tron bike from its top all-arounder status. Our answer is: yes, but you have to decide where you want to gain an advantage over the Tron, and this will be determined by your wheelset choice.

Example #1: Throw the new DT Swiss disc on and the Addict is 8.5 seconds faster on the flats, but 4 seconds slower on the climbs compared to the Tron.

Example #2: Use the ENVE 7.8 wheelset and the Addict is 6 seconds slower on the flats, but 9 seconds faster on the climbs.

So where do you want your advantage to be? Your wheelset choice with the Addict RC will determine if it outclimbs the Tron, or outpaces it on flat ground. But no wheelset currently in game will let you do both.

Conclusions

The Scott Addict RC is a super-impressive all-arounder, turning in nearly best-in-game climbing performance while maintaining speed on the flats and descents.

It’s almost like have a Specialized Aethos frame without taking the aero performance hit. And because of that, this frame is the smart choice for any Zwift road race that will have decisive climbs. It will give you a huge advantage on the climbs (when effort is highest), and you shouldn’t feel much of a penalty while sitting in on the flats and descents.

Due to this frame’s incredible aero performance we’ll be updating the following posts soon:

Additionally, whenever a new frame is added to the Drop Shop we add it to our Master Zwift Frames List and update the following:

Questions or Comments?

Share below!

Important note: this post contains speed test results for Zwift frames or wheels. These results may change over time, and a bike's performance relative to others may also change. We don't always revise posts when performance rankings change, but we do keep current, master versions of our speed test results which are always available. See the frame charts, wheel charts, and Tron vs Top Performers for current performance data.

How To Prepare For The Rapha Women’s 100 (Zwift PowerUp Cycling Podcast)

About this Episode

Never ridden 100km? Want to ride 100km stronger than ever before? Matt Rowe, Greg Henderson, and Kristin Armstrong help you prepare to take on the challenge, whether it’s for the Rapha Women’s 100 or your own personal goal. 

About the Podcast

The Zwift PowerUp Cycling Podcast features training tips from host Matt Rowe (Rowe & King), with regular co-hosts Greg Henderson, Rahsaan Bahati, Dani Rowe, and Kristin Armstrong.

“Climber’s Gambit” Watopia Route Details

0

“Climber’s Gambit” Watopia Route Details

See https://zwiftinsider.com/route/climbers-gambit/ for details.


“Legends and Lava” Watopia Route Details

0

“Legends and Lava” Watopia Route Details

See https://zwiftinsider.com/route/legends-and-lava/ for details.