Home Blog Page 452

The Endurance Lab Coaches’ Corner 62

The Endurance Lab Coaches’ Corner 62

In this episode:

  • Season goals and how to set up your training for A, B and C events (Annual Training Plan)
  • Training and recovery tools, gadgets, for swimming, running, and cycling: are they useful?

and more!

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVEQWVL3290&w=560&h=315]

Recording Date: 02/11/2019


Tour de Zwift 2019 Wrapup: a Look at the Numbers

0

Tour de Zwift 2019 Wrapup: a Look at the Numbers

January’s Tour de Zwift was the biggest multi-stage event ever held on our favorite indoor training platform, with nearly 120,000 riders taking part in stages between January 3rd and February 4th.

Stage One came out strong with 43,182 Zwifters finishing. It’s a good thing we had multiple events for each stage because all of those riders at once would be like 245 Tour de France pelotons riding together! In order to accommodate multiple time zones, Zwift ran a total of 468 events in these nine stages.

Here are more numbers just released by Zwift:

  • A total of 119,076 Zwifters took part
  • 24,758 Zwifters completed all 9 Stages
  • In total, Zwifters covered 8,088,702 miles / 13,017,503 km during the Tour de Zwift, or 314 times around the world.
  • Zwifters climbed a mind-boggling 180,025,715 meters — that’s halfway to the moon!
  • Still feeling that holiday weight? Zwifters burned 297,224,138 calories during the Tour de Zwift. If a pound of fat is roughly equal to 3500 calories, we burned almost 85,000 pounds of fat!
  • Zwifters are a social group. In total, ‘Tour de Zwifters’ received 1,911,633 RideOns
  • The biggest stage was Stage 1, seeing 43,182 people take on the Mayan Jungle Circuit
  • 34 professional cyclists and triathletes took part

How Did You Rank?

Did you ride the Tour as a race? Check out ZwiftPower’s overall results to see how you ranked against others in this race/not a race.

I came in 1757th in the A’s, out of 3,420 who finished all 9 stages. (Of course, we have to remember ZwiftPower only displays info from riders who have opted into ZwiftPower and set up a ZwiftPower account… so there were certainly more finishers than we see.)

Completion stats from ZwiftPower:

  • A: 3,420
  • B: 2,464
  • C (Women only): 152

The ZwiftPower Minority

These numbers offer a rare window into overall ZwiftPower usage. If Zwift shows 24,758 total completions, but ZwiftPower only shows 6,036, that means the vast majority of Zwifters (3 out of 4) don’t use ZwiftPower at all.

Of course, this isn’t much of a surprise with an event like TdZ, since many participants won’t be racers, and only racers would be signed up for ZwiftPower. Still, my hope is that eventually ZwiftPower, or a service like it, will be tightly integrated into Zwift to better govern and display the results of competitive rides.

ᐧ


Garmin Announces Acquisition of Tacx

Garmin Announces Acquisition of Tacx

The cycling world, and especially the indoor cycling world, is abuzz today with the news that Garmin has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Tacx.

About the Companies

Garmin is headquartered in Olathe, Kansas, USA and has pioneered new GPS navigation and other wireless devices designed for people who live an active lifestyle. Garmin actually serves several “non-fitness” markets as well, including automotive, aviation, and marine.

Tacx is headquartered in Wassenaar, Netherlands with a distribution center in Vogt, Germany. They are best known in the cycling world for their indoor trainers, with their Neo and now Neo 2 being the flagship products, (arguably) at the top of their class. Their staff of 200 will be joining Garmin’s global team.

The completion of this acquisition, which is subject to customary conditions, is expected to occur in Q2 2019. Tacx is a privately-held company, so financial terms of the acquisition will not be released.

Moving Indoors

This move brings Garmin definitively into the indoor cycling space, an area where they have never had a strong presence. While they are the market leader in cycling computers used outdoors, they don’t sell any devices specifically for the indoor space (such as bike trainers).

“Tacx brings an entirely new product category to Garmin’s fitness portfolio that expands our reach into the indoor training market,” said Cliff Pemble, Garmin president and CEO. “Together with Tacx, Garmin will offer a seamless, enjoyable and motivating indoor and outdoor experience for cyclists all year long.”

Hitting Back at Wahoo

Wahoo, arguably the world’s top manufacturer of smart trainers with its KICKR line, began moving into Garmin’s territory when it released the Elemnt bike computer back in early 2016, closely followed by the Bolt and Elemnt Mini a year later.

Today’s move by Garmin puts Wahoo squarely in the crosshairs, as evidenced by Garmin CEO Pemble’s reference to offering a “seamless, enjoyable and motivating indoor … experience for cyclists…”

What Does it Mean for Us?

Of course, competition is good for the consumer. When firms compete, consumers get the best possible prices and quality.

Tacx’s Neo is an amazing trainer (my wife rides one herself), but they continue to sell a confusing line of fairly poor wheel-on trainers known to lack accuracy and durability. And while they should be applauded for innovation in the indoor space, their Neo Bike Smart is vaporware thus far, and the Magnum Smart Treadmill is still only available in four countries, at a price of $10k.

In addition to their trainer business, Tacx still has Tacx Trainer Software (TTS), an outdated “Zwift-like” system, as well as Tacx Films, real-life videos that integrate into TTS.

My hope is that Garmin will bring more focus and consistency to Tacx’s product line, narrowing the catalog to (perhaps) three levels of updated, reliable smart trainers while getting the Neo Smart Bike launched.

We will certainly see tighter integration between Tacx trainers and Garmin computers, which can only be a good thing. It may even be that within a year or two Garmin will have developed an “indoor ecosystem” akin to Wahoo’s, effectively forcing cyclists to choose between two camps.

Will Garmin try to resurrect Tacx Trainer Software and take aim at Zwift? I highly doubt it, but if they did they would instantly become the most viable competitor in Zwift’s space, making things really interesting. I’m sure ZwiftHQ will be watching closely.


New York “KOM After Party” Route Details

0

New York “KOM After Party” Route Details

New York’s “NYC KOM After Party” was created in February 2019 and is currently only available as an event route (no free-riding).

Route Profile

This route is basically three laps of Gotham Grind Reverse followed by a trip up the Forward KOM, ending at the KOM banner.

Route details:
Distance: 37km (22.9 miles)
Elevation Gain: 440m (1444′)
Strava Segment (Pens to Banner)

rame>


“Your Week On Zwift” Email from ZHQ

4

“Your Week On Zwift” Email from ZHQ

Zwift recently rolled out a fun new feature I didn’t even know I wanted… the “Your Week On Zwift” email! Each week they’re telling us our overall progress for the week: hours spent on Zwift, number of Ride Ons given and received, number of new Zwifters we started following and started following us, total distance, total climbing, total calories burned, farthest distance and longest ride.

YOU get a Ride On and YOU get a Ride On…

The first week I got it, the email said I had given 579 Ride Ons! Apparently, I’m a really friendly Zwifter!

How did I hand out so many? I generally will pop on to the Zwift Companion App when I’m bored and give them out here and there.

But the biggest way I’ve given out so many is on a low effort (slow) ride: I’ll double-click my Position Indicator in the Zwift Companion App and it’ll give out up to 5 Ride Ons to people in my vicinity. I enjoy doing that, seeing all kinds of blue thumbs go up around me! (This is, unfortunately, unavailable when doing group rides)

What’s more important? Friendship? Or Distance?

I kept that Ride On number in my head so that I could try to give more the following week. I think it must have stuck a little too well as I ended up riding less the next week. It seems I should have had the goal of riding a longer distance or burning more calories as all of those decreased. Whoops!

Technically I still hit my goal of 80km but, well… I always enjoy knowing I’ve made improvements. This week I’ve already ridden a longer ride than the 50 minutes of the week before, so one goal met!

Why did ZHQ start sending these emails?

I caught up with Jonathan Walton, one of the two guys responsible for the emails we get. Here’s what he had to say:

“It started with co-founders Scott Barger and Jon Mayfield. They knew the Zwift community would love to get a summary of their stats, social highlights, and other notable moments over the past week. Zwift serves a ton of achievements and little moments one might forget. It’s also easy to miss a Zwift confetti celebration when you’re full-gassing it through Watopia. With that, we needed a new way to say “You’re better than you once were” by summarizing all your relevant goodies in one intimate place—your inbox.”

Jonathan went on to add that they keep a close eye on email replies as well as other areas people may express an opinion. They enjoy the feedback and are always working to improve our experience.

What about you?

What numbers are standing out to you on your own “Your Week On Zwift?” Which ones are you going to work on? Which one surprised you the most?


WTRL “GC-Timed” Triad Cup Series Begins Tomorrow

0

WTRL “GC-Timed” Triad Cup Series Begins Tomorrow

First, a Little Background

The World Tactical Racing League (WTRL) began almost a year ago when organizers Mark Swatton and Steven Milliken decided it would be great fun to get as many of their respective teammates to join the same race and have the two teams race each other in all 4 categories.

The concept was a success, and Mark (event and race organizer for Race3R) and Steven (race team leader for Team Type 1) learned that other teams wanted to join in. So in the summer of 2018 they developed the concept of a race series that was all about team racing in all of the 4 categories.

Winter Team Racing League launched in October 2018, and the original plan was to run for just the winter. It was a smashing success, with 136 different teams and over 1000 individual racers taking part!

After such a successful first series they realized there was a demand on Zwift for what they were providing, so they rebranded as World Tactical Racing Leagues in February 2019.

Mark told me, “Our main aim is to host races that are fun, fair and all-inclusive. Every racer matters to us. The last D rider deserves exactly the same race experience as the 1st A rider to cross the finish line. We believe this to be the future of Zwift racing and will always follow that ethos.”

Ride on, Mark!

Announcing the Triad Cup Series


The Triad Cup series is the next project for the WTRL’s Saturday time slot (8:45 EST, 13:45 GMT, 14:45 CET).

The concept is simple:  3 races over 3 successive Saturdays:

  • A Crit-style circuit course
  • A Hilly or Kom finish course
  • A longer flat race

Here’s the cool part: like a pro stage race, riders will be ranked by their time, not their finish position. So this is a “GC timed” race series, and at the end of the 3-week series whoever has the shortest overall time will be crowned their category’s champion. The series will then re-set to run again on a different set of race routes.

The series incorporates all the original aspects of the team racing league but adds to it an individual league, making it attractive to non-team racers who may have felt left out before.

Rules

 


Racing on Zwift – Challenges and Opportunities for Spectators

0
Virtual racing on Zwift is faced with many challenges, and this isn’t a surprise: it’s a young platform with an unproven business model. At the same time, virtual bike racing opens up new opportunities with its accessibility, reduced injury risk, gamification potential and much more. Although racing has been a part of Zwift since its early days, we are only now beginning to see it gain real prominence in the cycling world as pros engage, governing bodies endorse, and the user base expands. Now is a prudent time to examine this platform’s challenges and opportunities so we can work together to overcome the obstacles early and capitalize on the strengths. This is the first in a three-part series exploring Zwift racing’s challenges and opportunities. Today we will focus on spectating Zwift races. What’s working, what isn’t, and how do we fix it?

Challenge: How Do I Watch It?

Even though there are multiple race broadcasts each week, we still have no central schedule of upcoming Zwift race broadcasts. This is growing pains, the product of most race broadcasting being a grassroots effort with insufficient manpower/funding. And I’m confident this will change as Zwift continues to grow the racing segment. But for now, the simple truth is that a certain number of viewers never watch the live streams because they don’t know about them. And that’s a pity, because getting the word out is the easy part.

Opportunity: Stream Everywhere

Today’s technology makes streaming high-quality Zwift races affordable and easy. It doesn’t take much in terms of hardware to set up a decent broadcasting rig, and that stream can be broadcast free over YouTube, Twitch, Facebook, and other services. No licensing rights to purchase, no Internet bandwidth to lease. This means spectators should have access to Zwift race live streams wherever and whenever they want them, at no charge. On my smart TV, my phone, my computer? Yes, please. The only thing missing here is a central calendar of quality upcoming race streams. List the upcoming races, each with a link to click and watch. And send out email alerts while you’re at it. Who’s going to build it? Or perhaps (better) it could be included in Zwift Companion?

Challenge: Who Are These People?

Admit it: outdoor road races can be boring to watch, especially when you aren’t familiar with the riders. So much of cycling is about the stories of the individual racers, the rivalries, their individual strengths and weaknesses. The story of Mathew Hayman winning Paris-Roubaix after breaking his arm and recovering on Zwift comes to mind… But this is Zwift. A land of (mostly) unknown amateurs. And until spectators get to know some of the racers, watching a Zwift race will remain a somewhat disconnected, dispassionate affair.

Opportunity: Tell the Community’s Stories

I have no doubt that some of our community’s amateur “indoor specialists” will gain more notoriety than many pro riders as more eyes reach our platform in the coming years. Let’s tell their stories. If race broadcasters could better connect their viewers to the racers, they would build a much more passionate and dedicated audience. It may not be easy to weave several compelling personal storylines into a 45-60 minute race broadcast, but making an effort to do so will surely pay off. Other media also provide an opportunity to feature the stories of racers. Interviews here on Zwift Insider, posts about athletes on Zwift’s corporate blog, and good ol’ ZwiftPower stats all provide much-needed windows into the stories behind the avatars. It’s easy to turn off a race stream when you don’t have a hero in the front group. Let’s make some heroes.

Challenge: Live Spectating

The term “live Zwift race event” may seem like an oxymoron, but it’s actually far from it. I attended CVR World Cup Los Angeles at the VELO Sports Center last March, and it was fun! That said, what made it fun for me was interacting with the racers, cheering them on and even giving some of the less experienced riders advice as they approached certain parts of the course. This is doable when you have 10 racers and 50 spectators, but it doesn’t scale well. Would I want to sit “in the stands” and watch Zwift racers on stage? Sure, if the stakes were high. But I wouldn’t pay much money or spend time traveling to do so. Will Zwift racing ever have the pull of the Tour de France, with its claimed 12 million roadside spectators? Of course not… it’s a physical impossibility. Will it ever fill an e-sports arena? Perhaps. But focusing on live spectators is the wrong approach.

Opportunity: Massive Online Audience

Live streaming can bring the Zwift racing experience to a massive, global audience. Anyone with an Internet connection can watch Zwift races, and if the broadcast is compelling enough they will do so. Zwift must surely understand there is huge marketing potential here as well. We all have cycling friends who could benefit from Zwifting but haven’t given it a try yet. Get those folks to watch a quality Zwift race stream and they may just go out and buy a smart trainer the next day. So focus on getting Internet viewers, and only worry about live events if they somehow make the Internet viewing significantly more compelling.

Challenge: Lack of Live Action

Let’s face it: nobody wants to watch a Zwift race unless something is added to it. Avatars by themselves are only exciting if you are one of the avatars.  Zwift Community Live’s Nathan Guerra understands this, and he works to bring in other elements including post-race interviews and additional commentators. But we need more. We need to see and hear the real people behind the avatars.

Opportunity: Live Webcams

Racers could stream live video of themselves on the bike so we can see their pain faces and posture. Perhaps we even need to hear their efforts from time to time. (CVR had some good ideas in this vein before they went sideways, jumping ship to build their own racing platform.) If broadcasters can’t handle pulling up live streams of racers for a picture-in-picture view of the action, perhaps a live streaming site could be created which lets viewers choose from a variety of live webcams while the main broadcast audio and video continue to play. I’m not sure what the best solution is, but I know there’s one out there.

Challenge: Poor Visuals

At this point, broadcasters don’t have much more to work with beyond just watching other riders from within the Zwift game. Unlike outdoor races where riders position themselves in the draft and hold a wheel, Zwift pelotons are constantly churning, making it very tough to pick out who’s who. The constantly-changing rider list on the right doesn’t help much either. Is Rider X off the back? Off the front? In this pack? And what pack are we even looking at right now? Sometimes these answers are obvious… other times they are not. All of this information is available, if you know where to look (*ahem*… ZwiftPower… *ahem*) but Joe Spectator won’t know that.

Opportunity: Metrics to the Max

Here is an opportunity for Zwift to outshine outdoor racing in a big way. We have all the important data on all the riders, throughout the event. Here’s a quick list:
  • Speed
  • Heartrate
  • Power
  • Average Power
  • Distance completed, distance left
  • Elevation climbed, elevation still to climb
  • Time gaps between riders/groups
  • Current gradient
  • Current location on map
  • Total ride time
  • Rider list (including team name)
  • Etc…
Spectators need a screen which lets them immediately, intuitively understand what is going on at any given time during the race. They shouldn’t see a message about “watching” a particular rider at the top of the screen… but at all times they should know what group or portion of the race we are currently watching, and how much distance is left. Display some of those key metrics when it makes sense, and let the broadcasters decide when to show or hide some or all of them. Take a cue from outdoor race broadcasts, but improve on it since we have amazing metrics at our fingertips. (More on this in part two, where we’ll focus on broadcasting Zwift races.)

Challenge: A Weak Finish

Some races end with a simple, “Well, here’s who won. See ya folks!” Sometimes the end result is a bit of a question mark, if a rider’s power numbers seem dodgy. (More on dodgy numbers in part three of this series). The important thing here is that, at the precise spot where spectators should feel the most excitement, things can just… fizzle. This isn’t every time, but it happens often enough that it’s an issue. We need a definite winner (or even a full podium) and we need to connect with those winners on a deeper level.

Opportunity: More Metrics, More Connection

What if a race ended, and immediately on screen we saw the winner’s name and final stats? What if there were other stats, perhaps for the rider with the highest 20-minute power, or advanced numbers like the rider who burned the most matches, or won the sprint competition, or…? The important thing is to get those results and metrics up quickly, and make them interesting and impressive. Lastly: get that winner (or the whole podium) on a webcam and talk to them within 5 minutes of the finish. Make that connection!

Conclusion

It’s still early days for Zwift racing, and this is evident when spectating races. Live streams are still hard to find, difficult to follow, and impersonal if you’re not plugged into the Zwift racing community. Still, there are big opportunities here to reach and engage a massive, global audience. If people will stand on the side of the road for hours just to watch the pro peloton fly by, they’ll certainly tune in to watch a short Zwift race…. but only if they can connect with the real riders and follow the action as it unfolds.

What Do You Think?

I’d love to hear your thoughts on the challenges and opportunities Zwift racing holds for spectators today. Share below!

Fun Facts for February Fondos (this weekend!)

0

Fun Facts for February Fondos (this weekend!)

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

February’s fondo events are this weekend, and riders can choose from one of three new custom Watopia fondo routes which were launched last month. Click a route below to learn all about it!

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_accordion _builder_version=”3.19.12″][et_pb_accordion_item _builder_version=”3.19.4″ title=”Invisible Row” link_option_url_new_window=”off” use_background_color_gradient=”off” background_color_gradient_start=”#2b87da” background_color_gradient_end=”#29c4a9″ background_color_gradient_type=”linear” background_color_gradient_direction=”180deg” background_color_gradient_direction_radial=”center” background_color_gradient_start_position=”0%” background_color_gradient_end_position=”100%” background_color_gradient_overlays_image=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” background_size=”cover” background_position=”center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend=”normal” allow_player_pause=”off” background_video_pause_outside_viewport=”on” text_shadow_style=”none” box_shadow_style=”none” custom_css_before=”display:none;” custom_css_main_element=”display:none;” custom_css_after=”display:none;” custom_css_toggle=”display:none;” custom_css_open_toggle=”display:none;” custom_css_toggle_title=”display:none;” custom_css_toggle_icon=”display:none;” custom_css_toggle_content=”display:none;” hover_transition_duration=”300ms” hover_transition_delay=”0ms” hover_transition_speed_curve=”ease” /][et_pb_accordion_item _builder_version=”3.19.4″ title=”Bambino Fondo (C Group)” link_option_url_new_window=”off” use_background_color_gradient=”off” background_color_gradient_start=”#2b87da” background_color_gradient_end=”#29c4a9″ background_color_gradient_type=”linear” background_color_gradient_direction=”180deg” background_color_gradient_direction_radial=”center” background_color_gradient_start_position=”0%” background_color_gradient_end_position=”100%” background_color_gradient_overlays_image=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” background_size=”cover” background_position=”center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend=”normal” allow_player_pause=”off” background_video_pause_outside_viewport=”on” text_shadow_style=”none” box_shadow_style=”none” hover_transition_duration=”300ms” hover_transition_delay=”0ms” hover_transition_speed_curve=”ease” text_shadow_horizontal_length=”0em” text_shadow_vertical_length=”0em” text_shadow_blur_strength=”0em”]

Official description:

Take in the heart of Watopia with a flat warmup before tackling the original Watopia KOM. Then head over to the Mayan Ruins for a lap of the jungle – look out for the sloth! – before finishing up the Volcano Climb.

The Bambino Fondo is essentially these routes strung together:

Distance: 52.2km (32.4 miles)
Elevation Gain: 580m (1902′)
Strava Segment (from start pier)

[/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item _builder_version=”3.19.4″ title=”Medio Fondo (B Group)” link_option_url_new_window=”off” use_background_color_gradient=”off” background_color_gradient_start=”#2b87da” background_color_gradient_end=”#29c4a9″ background_color_gradient_type=”linear” background_color_gradient_direction=”180deg” background_color_gradient_direction_radial=”center” background_color_gradient_start_position=”0%” background_color_gradient_end_position=”100%” background_color_gradient_overlays_image=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” background_size=”cover” background_position=”center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend=”normal” allow_player_pause=”off” background_video_pause_outside_viewport=”on” text_shadow_style=”none” box_shadow_style=”none” hover_transition_duration=”300ms” hover_transition_delay=”0ms” hover_transition_speed_curve=”ease” text_shadow_horizontal_length=”0em” text_shadow_vertical_length=”0em” text_shadow_blur_strength=”0em”]

Official description:

Warmup with a trip to Sequoia Circle before climbing the original Watopia KOM in the longer, gentler reverse direction. From there the climbing continues with a trip up the Volcano KOM, and tour of the Mayan Ruins jungle, and then finish off with a long climb up the Epic KOM (arch; not tower).

The Medio Fondo is essentially these routes strung together:

Distance: 72.9km (45.3 miles)
Elevation Gain: 1010m (3313′)

Strava won’t let us create one segment for this route, so we split it into three. We also created a Strava route which covers this full route. The GPS elevation data for the Strava route appears to be corrupt in parts, but the numbers above for distance and elevation are from ZwiftHQ and accurate.

Strava Segment Part 1 (from start pier) Strava Segment Part 2 (from jungle turn-off) Strava Segment Part 3 (epic KOM) Strava Route

[/et_pb_accordion_item][et_pb_accordion_item _builder_version=”3.19.4″ title=”Gran Fondo (A Group)” link_option_url_new_window=”off” use_background_color_gradient=”off” background_color_gradient_start=”#2b87da” background_color_gradient_end=”#29c4a9″ background_color_gradient_type=”linear” background_color_gradient_direction=”180deg” background_color_gradient_direction_radial=”center” background_color_gradient_start_position=”0%” background_color_gradient_end_position=”100%” background_color_gradient_overlays_image=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” background_size=”cover” background_position=”center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_blend=”normal” allow_player_pause=”off” background_video_pause_outside_viewport=”on” text_shadow_style=”none” box_shadow_style=”none” hover_transition_duration=”300ms” hover_transition_delay=”0ms” hover_transition_speed_curve=”ease” text_shadow_horizontal_length=”0em” text_shadow_vertical_length=”0em” text_shadow_blur_strength=”0em”]

 

Official description:

This longest Fondo route takes you on a meandering – and ascending – tour of Watopia. Start out with the original KOM in the reverse direction before climbing the Volcano. From there, you’ll do a lap of the Mayan Ruins jungle and then take on the steeper – but shorter – original KOM in the forward direction. Mix in flat laps around downtown Watopia and the Volcano Circuit before finishing at the Epic KOM summit (arch; not tower).

The Gran Fondo is very similar to the Medio Fondo in terms of key climbs and overall elevation, but ~25km (15.5 miles) longer due to some meandering around Watopia proper between the “Road to Ruins” section and the “Mountain Route” ending. This route is essentially these routes strung together:

Distance: 97.8km (60.8 miles)
Elevation Gain: 1196m (3924′)

Strava won’t let us create one segment for this route, so we split it into three. We also created a Strava route which covers this full route. The GPS elevation data for the Strava route appears to be corrupt in parts, but the numbers above for distance and elevation are from ZwiftHQ and accurate.

Strava Segment Part 1 (from start pier) Strava Segment Part 2 (to start/finish) Strava Segment Part 3 (to epic KOM)
Strava Route

[/et_pb_accordion_item][/et_pb_accordion][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

UNLOCK THE FONDO KITS

All Zwifters who finish a Fondo route will unlock the official Zwift February Fondo kit. Each of the 6 Fondos from November to April has a unique kit to unlock.

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://zwiftinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/zfondo_feb19.jpg” align=”center” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

UPCOMING FONDO DATES:

  • February 10
  • March 10
  • April 7

See upcoming Fondo rides on ZwiftHacks >


This Week’s Top 5 Zwift Videos

This Week’s Top 5 Zwift Videos

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

Zwift Headquarters Office Tour

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_video _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74_qdaVrn1Q” image_src=”//i.ytimg.com/vi/74_qdaVrn1Q/hqdefault.jpg” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

How would you imagine Zwift HQ looks? Personally, I’d place it in the middle of Watopia, so there must be a volcano somewhere. Triathlon Taren, one of the regulars in this series, had the privilege to figure it out from the inside.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

How To Zwift on a Spin Bike | Advantages & Disadvantages

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_video _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPokCgVUKIY” image_src=”//i.ytimg.com/vi/KPokCgVUKIY/hqdefault.jpg” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

Before Zwift, many of you were training on spinning bikes in your local gym. Maybe you miss this. But then your spinning kilometers don’t count for your Zwift miles. Or can they?

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

Zwift v Sufferfest v TrainerRoad (2019)

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_video _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCEoZGEXYs0″ image_src=”//i.ytimg.com/vi/oCEoZGEXYs0/hqdefault.jpg” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

Brian Davis wasn’t the biggest fan of Zwift when it launched, so he kept using also Trainerroad and Sufferfest. He has followed their evolution also over time. This makes his comparison of all three platforms interesting.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ad” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

My open letter to Zwift… 

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_video _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=114MHcOgISw” image_src=”//i.ytimg.com/vi/114MHcOgISw/hqdefault.jpg” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

In typical Vlog style, it’s about this and that before Cameron addresses that never-ending discussion on weight doping. Now that Zwift is turning ever more serious at the top end, can they continue to take an agnostic approach to weight doping?

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

Cheap Zwift Climbing Hack

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_video _builder_version=”3.19.12″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ADS2gf5tD8″ image_src=”//i.ytimg.com/vi/U6A4i_vuuro/hqdefault.jpg” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.12″]

The Wahoo Kickr Climb is rather expensive… or you ride another brand’s trainer that isn’t compatible. Be happy: you can still get yourself a climbing setup. Which seems obvious afterwards…


Morning Grind Series 2, Race 1 Report

0

Morning Grind Series 2, Race 1 Report

The first race of Morning Grind’s second series was held on the “London Loop with Box Hill Finish” route. A category raced 2.5 laps while B, C, and D riders only had to suffer through 1.5 laps.

A Cat Report by Matt Gardiner

The Morning Grind Fondo kicked off the second series with one of the toughest courses imaginable. The starting pen was more full than it had ever been in series #1, and the caliber of riders also ticked up several notches—some of Zwift’s strongest showed up to throw down.

The bunch was very calm on the flats knowing what was ahead, and thankfully the race was boring until we hit Box Hill. As we turned right into the climb, the group split immediately, with half of the riders falling off the lead bunch.  Matt Gardiner took the KOM in 5:50 with the remaining in the lead group crossing the line under 6 minutes.

The group stayed together through the descent and flats until the second ascent of Box Hill. Jose Wence attacked at the base, getting a 0:03 gap before DRAFT closed the gap and controlled the pace. Shortly after, Lionel Vujasin attacked with 2 minutes left in the ascent, forcing riders to accelerate to not let him get away. In all, only 4-5 riders were dropped off the group as we hit the descent.

On the final climb to the finish, accelerations wreaked havoc on the bunch as riders fought for position—Sam Brännlund, Huang Xiao Yu, and Yunfei Wu attacked at the painted road and found a gap behind them before ramping up the sprint. The riders carried their effort through the finish going 1-2-3.

Series 2 A standings:

  • Sam Brännlund, Innovation: 80 pts
  • Huang Xiao, +1S: 72 pts
  • Yunfei Wu, +1S: 64 pts

B Cat Report by Ken Nowell

Series 2, race 1 was a massive success with a record 75 B riders in the pen! With individual categories having separate starts, it seemed to be a little bit less of a chaotic start at a slightly milder pace. But by the time we hit the first rollers, all hell was breaking loose and those that were in for the win were showing their teeth.

At about the 8-minute mark, a blistering pace was set up Box Hill that had us revving over 4 watts/kilo average. The hill shattered the peloton into a front group and a chasing pack. Activity on Discord was lively and riders were marked and breaks were chased down.

Team Type 1’s Paul Buckland made his intentions clear that he wanted the series 2 title and the race win. As the group hit the upper ramps of Box Hill on lap 2, a group of 5 strong riders including 2 from Team DIRT, Buckland and a few privateers broke off the front with a pace the others could not match.

With a quarter mile to go, the sprint was unleashed with the win for Buckland looking promising. Unfortunately for him, DIRT underdog Shawn McAfee pulled a hat trick and took the win with what was almost a premature celebration. The hilltop banner, unbeknownst to most riders was about 100 ft after of the finish line. Shawn can be seen throwing his hands in the air on his live stream just under the banner and had just enough speed to coast over the finish line in the front position. Well played, Shawn!

Series 2 B standings:

  • Shawn McAfee, DIRT: 80 pts
  • Chris Ostberg, R2R: 72 pts
  • Paul Buckland, Team Type 1: 64 pts

Check out B winner Shawn McAfee’s race recap video:

D Cat Report by Jamie Jackson

The second iteration of the series kicked off with a bang as the top five D finishers averaged 2.4w/kg and above.

Having separate category starts and a shorter course brought more D rider participation than in the past. The start was very strong but maintainable for the riders with a small initial split occurring. The remaining riders worked well in a group before being gutted on the first climb. The first series winner, Len Baird, lost the wheel of the main group at this point.

As the group strung out, one could see above category riders pulling away. This became more pronounced as the strongest Ds hit Box Hill holding 2.6w/kg while others were well above 3.0w/kg. A small lead group continued to push a steady pace leading to a split that seemed insurmountable.

The riders crested and made the push back towards the city with the subway stairs being the remaining challenge. Jamie Jackson [DIRT] (first MGF series runner up) went all out on the stairs to reduce the gap to a couple riders from the lead group. He and another triathlete, Jason Zilles [DIRT], raced each other to the line with Jackson taking the spot on the sprint.

With four riders over w/kg that put Jamie Jackson [DIRT] into first place for the race and series. Newcomer Wesley Stocker [DIRT] was second with Mike Ewing finishing in third.

Series 2 B standings:

  • Jamie Jackson, DIRT: 80 pts
  • Wesley Stocker, DIRT: 72 pts
  • Mike Ewing: 64 pts

View race results on ZwiftPower.com >


About the Morning Grind

The Morning Grind is a collaborative 12-week race series between Team DRAFT and Team DIRT where overall standings are tracked and prizes will be giving to category winners at the end of the series based on cumulative standings.

DRAFT is a virtual bike racing team that competes with the global community on Zwift promoting sportsmanship, unity, and integrity. DIRT (Dads Inside Riding Trainers) is a group of dads making time for ourselves for fitness, fun, and friendship on the Zwift platform by hosting daily rides and weekly races.