One of cinema’s most iconic moments comes from the film ‘Forest Gump’, when Tom Hanks’ character Forrest Gump casually states, “Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.”
That saying applies to the Zwift Companion app, as when you open it up and scroll through the day’s events, there are usually a few treats on offer.
This weekend’s little sweetie was the “Nations Challenge” run by WTRL. It was something quite different to the normal races offered on Zwift, so I signed up as the chance to represent my country in a sporting activity doesn’t come around often for a novice like myself. Clearly many felt the same, as 523 other riders had eagerly signed up!
About the Nations Challenge
The Nation’s Challenge was a country-based race where riders from the same country would race around Watopia on a custom 50km length of the Figure 8 Reverse route, decked out in their country’s jersey. The route was the same course that the UCI Cycling Esports World Championship would be contested on, giving us a taste of the pro life.
The premise was that people from the same country would work together and team up and race the course with the top 10 percent and bottom 10 percent being discounted and the average time for the country calculated from the remaining 80 percent. So teamwork seemed essential if you wanted to win this challenge, as it was simply one giant country team time trial.
Carnage at the Start

Now, those who have raced in a bunch or undertaken a well organised group ride know the power of the bunch. So, in my naivety with 524 riders, I expected our British Team to cruise around the course and quite literally win the event. As I sat spinning my legs waiting to start, the thought of riding in this “mega blob” was appealing. Unfortunately, it would quickly become apparent that not everyone was on my wavelength.
Immediately from the start it was carnage, with the usual Zwift 400-watt start we are all accustomed to. I couldn’t help but feel that the ‘team’ concept may have been lost on a few and back down the field there was unorganised chaos as people rode at their own speed, trying to find a suitable group.
Within moments I was in 250th position, which meant that the front group had already put some distance into my group and was already up the road, long before most people had literally got off the start. The first message I saw was “We need a DS” – absolutely. We certainly did need a Director Sportif to organise this chaos!
It was at this point the value of the “Beacon” would have prevailed and an experienced Group Leader, to help guide the masses.
Teaming Up
Recognising the need to “blob up” I joined the message chatter as a few other riders realised the importance of teamwork. One rider was Russell, a classy rider from Race3r, who I had ridden with previously in a Team Time Trial, and we began organising our group, which was now in 290th position.
Russell was slightly behind in around 320th but he managed to pull his group into mine. This larger group soon found its rhythm and we began “hoovering up” smaller packs as we began making headway. The strength of the group began to prevail.
What I learned was that trying to manage a group is a challenge. The group could sustain around 3.2 watts per kilo, however when we tried to push the pace, we occasionally and unintentionally caused small splits and had to slow down, or in some cases, drop back to fill the gap. With this in mind, the first major challenge was the KOM, which Russell led the group up far better than I did. Unintentionally, I slipped into my climbing rhythm and was off up the climb without realising – that will be all those Zwift Hill Climb races I have been involved with.
Over the ensuing rollers I dropped to the back of the group to help try and pace those who were less confident on the climbs, whilst Russell kept it steady at the front.

Tempo and Tactics
In between talking tactics of the group, we discussed which nation may potentially win the event overall. We concluded that having a group of 500 riders was simply too big and unmanageable and perhaps the victor may come from a nation with a smaller team. We opted for Japan. (Incidentally, for the first round of races our guess turned out to be correct, with Japan’s 188 riders in first followed by Sweden in 2nd with 111 riders.)
As the race pressed on, riding 50km on the Watopia Reverse Figure 8 became confusing and I lost all sense of where I was as my focus was solely about trying to maintain the group. We were growing in size with each kilometre as our massive group was able to make significant gains on the smaller groups and individual riders on every descent.
Keeping a steady tempo, the kilometres ticked by and we led the now large group up the final KOM. I finished in 1 hour 18 minutes 36 seconds, in 248th position. 11 minutes, 40 seconds behind the leaders. I like to think that my domestique duties helped some riders finish quicker than they might have otherwise, and for me, it made a nice change to be riding cooperatively.
Preliminary Results
Team Great Britain placed 3rd overall after 1 event, with an average of 3.23 watts per kilo. This was on par with our group with an overall time of 1:17:18, 1 minute and 3 seconds behind early leaders, Japan.

Final Results
It transpires that Team GB didn’t do too well in the second race, dropping from 3rd to finish in 6th place 2 minutes and 35 seconds behind Sweden’s winning time of 1:14:58. Belgium and Japan finishing second and third respectively.
See full results at wtrl.racing >
Congratulations to WRTL for another entertaining event!
Your Comments
Did you ride in this weekend’s Nations Challenge? What did you think of the event? What are your thoughts on reasons why some countries did better than others? Share below!
Rode in the 1st USA slot. Agree that it was an entertaining & challenging race/ride. Too bad US did not even make the top 10. 😕 Congrats to the other nations!
There was a lot of talk in the pens and early about having trailing riders quit the race before finishing in order to raise the group’s average time. Kinda defeats the spirit of community and “everyone contributes.” I wonder if other countries pulled that tactic.🤔
‘taking one for the team’ is part of everyone contributes. Sacrifice for the greater good….
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few….
So said Spock. 🤔
Nice quote, I could have used that in the article, what with my film references – wasn’t that from Star Trek: The Motion Picture?
Wrath of Khan. (pushes glasses up his nose). 😉
👍
Where are the results. I cant find them in wtrl. Do i have to register to see results?
Same problem here. Not even to find the result when logged in. This wtrl page is quite a mess.
Yeah, I can’t see the results anywhere except on the short YouTube video which only shows top 10…. looked high and low on zwiftpower and wtrl.
Same for me. No idea where detailed results are. That being said, the short summary video was pretty cool.
Actually – try Zwiftpower, events->history. Good stuff there. I attached a screen snip.
The average time of a nation can be seen?
I did that like i do all races, so where is the nation rankings and results minis the top and bottom 10%?
yeah fair. I’m new to Zwift power so I got all excited when I found that page. But I don’t see country averages, etc … Maybe they aren’t going to publish?
2 time slots so few. Hope Better time slot next tim
Another big issue I found in both races – there was some semblance of team work, but almost 1/3rd of the field weren’t Aussies. And also, there was zero way to know who had actually jumped through the hoops of zwiftpower AND wtrl signups.
So when working for the team, who is the bottom 10%, who are we really working for???
Next time they either need to enable all zwifters registered for the nation, or make it far easier to see who is actually in the real event. It was fun, but really difficult to workout what needed to be done.
Also, maybe I’m just a sceptic oldish man, but I think the results point more to which nations tend to have riders who lie about weight or use less accurate power data….
You are right Ben, I realised at the end after viewing Zwift Power and my position was massively elevated from my road position and that I had potentially spent 50km helping people who would not post a time because they had no Zwift Power and / or WTRL account. It’s one of the reasons why I chose not to ride in the second event. The issue is I am not sure how you would overcome this hole unless it was mandatory for people to have a Zwift Power account to undertake events like that and then you are raising the topic about being an exclusive event, which defeats the purpose. I’m not sure of the answer, I’ll leave that for the organisers. I will just keep turning up, riding and writing. 👍
Having a WTRL account was not a requirement. This was an error in the event description, the requirements stated on the WTRL site are correct (ZwiftPower account required). I confirmed this with the WTRL organizers.
And any word on seeing the actual results? That’s half the fun, seeing the stats…..
In my opinion, since this should be also a social event, the averaging of the central “80% of the riders results” is not enough to build up the winning board. If a nation would have aimed to win, then the best tactic would have been to make ride only Class A/B riders… so in my opinion a weight average considering also the number of riders of different classes A/B/C/D should be more fair!
Anyhow was a pleasure to ride for my nation (Italy) even if we did not do in the top 10 🙂
Because it was average time rather than first to get 90% of riders across the line, it would have worked better with stronger riders making their own smaller blobs/lines (perhaps based on climbing speed) and pushing ahead.
From a lot of pace-partner experience, smaller groups travel same speed as bigger groups on lower wattage. It’s because of that sticky drafting.
(Anyone positioned in top 10% should obviously continually drop into a scoring position.)
Looks like UK improved their W/KG by a massive 0.01 after the second event. More teams improved by considerably more.
We sent the “Big guns” out on Saturday. Plus, the second race was Sunday “tea time” and having just had our Sunday Roast dinner, not the best time for us Brits – shame it wasn’t early morning, we would have improved for sure.😉
Another excellent article, Eric. It makes sense that countries with smaller numbers of riders crossing the line stands the better chance of winning over much larger groups–it’s a numbers game. But with the opportunity to ride as a representative of your country in a nations’ challenge (sort of like a world title championship), we will ride because we will have no other opportunity in our real lives (outside virtual racing) to do that. Definitely exhausting, but how cool was it to wear your country’s colors!
Thank you for the feedback – I totally agree it was pretty cool to wear the jersey of GB – only chance I will get to wear it. 👍
My team were discussing the best tactics for the race, given that there were several of us (Cats B/C) racing on the Saturday. We decided a huge blob just wouldn’t cut it, as you would be trying to keep the Ds in the pack. From the event perspective of 500 riders entered and not counting the top/bottom 10% then send a group of 50 up the road, and drop the slowest 50 riders, or use some up doing ‘hero’ stints. I had a thought that maybe the best option would be to have Pacers in the race? There’s also the thought that the event is based on average time per rider, so having lots of little splinter groups up front going for their very best time, and having the bus at the back mopping up everyone else seems like a good tactic? Whatever the outcome, there are some excellent UK DS’, so can we have one of them next time?
the wtrl website is a wreck
Thank you for the article – I’m glad that other nations faced similar “problems”. In fact, your story almost exactly describes our Germany’s race on Saturday 😀
I’ve been positively surprised from the amount of thought and discussion via chat, that was going on before and during the race. Apart from some “racers” who were not able to control themselves for the team, I think most riders worked together quite well, forming some big enough groups to accommodate the different level riders and give good drafting.
As an emotionally uncontrolled human I have to admit I encouraged a guy to stay who was almost quitting just before the start of the race because he couldn’t hold the proposed 4 w/kg (haha 😛 ) and didn’t want to slow us down. I really enjoyed seeing he finished and broke some PRs when I was checking the results after the race!
That’s what it all should be about – because, as some others here have pointed out correctly, there were a bit too many uncontrolled variables to take it too seriously as a race. However, I had some good fun, too!
Thanks for responding to my article. I really enjoyed reading your experience from the German Team’s point of view – I thought it was only us British who were disorganised. Like you said, in the end it was just good fun and to me, that is what Zwift is all about. I’m doing the Medium Fondo on Sunday morning, European time, for some more fun, so come and join me. 👍
Hi Tim, that’s definitely a good plan for Sunday. Currently I’m thinking of joining LEQP for the PRL Full – would be nice to tackle it in a bigger group at decent speed. But if I should not feel like riding 180km on Sunday morning I will join the Fondo!
I have ridden with LEQP many times and really enjoy their rides as they are well managed and if they are doing PRL Full, an offer to ride that route in a group would be a life and time saver and certainly not an opportunity to be missed. I did the PRL Full, solo, a few months ago. It took me 5.30hrs, in one hit. I am sure in a group you could save an hour and it be more fun. Good luck on your ride on Sunday. 👍
I was in the Saturday uk race on the front. During the initial few kms we discussed tactics and it was interesting to hear everyones thoughts. In the end we sent a number of riders back to 50th place (myself for included) to pace and provide wheels to follow. The thinking was 50th and behind were the numbers that counted, so help them was most important. What we didn’t know was is the top 10% and bottom 10% dropped from each race? Or the fastest and slowest from both combined? As you say, race 1 was quicker than race two, so as a nation who were the top 10% and bottom10% that were cut???
I started the saturday ride for Sweden, only for my ANT+ connection to miserably fail after 5km forcing me to abandon. Oh well 🙄 😁
Yes, but are you Swedish? 😋
I am indeed.
All Swedish cyclist should be able to ride in a nations challenge kit! Until next time 😉
Actually, I think that is a good idea. It would incentivise the next Nations Challenge.
I rode in your group. In fact I was the one who said we need a DS! I tried to do a bit of work on the front but got dropped at the end courtesy of some technical gremlins (laptop froze).
Quite interesting trying to manage a group of that size where no one knows each other and abilities very wildly.
Thanks for your message – I thought that comment about the DS was brilliant, hence why I included it. People now need to be careful what they say on the road as it may end up on Zwift Insider 😉
I thought we did the best job we could, it was a supportive group and a unique event to ride in. Sorry about the technical issues, would have great if you could have finished with us. I thought Russell was excellent. Hope we get chance to ride again. Ride On!