Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
  • Get Started
    • Create Zwift Account
    • How To Get Started On Zwift
    • Zwift Course Maps
    • How to Race on Zwift (Setup, Strategy, and More)
    • Women’s Racing on Zwift
    • Links Every Zwifter Must Have
    • More “Get Started” Posts
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Training & Nutrition
    • Racing
    • Zwift Hacks
  • Reference
    • How Zwift Works
    • Course Calendar
    • RoboPacer Calendar
    • Climb Portal Calendar
    • Upcoming Events
    • Game Updates
    • Smart Trainer Index
      • Current Models
      • Exhaustive Trainer List
    • Achievements & Unlocks
      • XP Basics for Riders
      • XP Basics for Runners
      • Kit Unlock Codes
      • Master List of Badges
    • Frames & Wheels
    • Routes & Maps
      • Master List: Routes
      • Master List: Climb Portal
      • Master List: KOMs
      • Master List: Sprints
      • Master List: Rebel Routes
      • Downloadable Watopia Map
      • Printable List of Routes by Difficulty
    • Speed Tests
    • Tiny Races
  • Women
    • Race Calendar
    • Why race?
    • Women’s Teams
    • Racer Spotlights
    • More Women’s Racing posts
  • Shop
    • Watopia Map and Other Posters
    • ZI Indoor Cycling Kit
Search
Logo
Logo
  • Get Started
    • Create Zwift Account
    • How To Get Started On Zwift
    • Zwift Course Maps
    • How to Race on Zwift (Setup, Strategy, and More)
    • Women’s Racing on Zwift
    • Links Every Zwifter Must Have
    • More “Get Started” Posts
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Training & Nutrition
    • Racing
    • Zwift Hacks
  • Reference
    • How Zwift Works
    • Course Calendar
    • RoboPacer Calendar
    • Climb Portal Calendar
    • Upcoming Events
    • Game Updates
    • Smart Trainer Index
      • Current Models
      • Exhaustive Trainer List
    • Achievements & Unlocks
      • XP Basics for Riders
      • XP Basics for Runners
      • Kit Unlock Codes
      • Master List of Badges
    • Frames & Wheels
    • Routes & Maps
      • Master List: Routes
      • Master List: Climb Portal
      • Master List: KOMs
      • Master List: Sprints
      • Master List: Rebel Routes
      • Downloadable Watopia Map
      • Printable List of Routes by Difficulty
    • Speed Tests
    • Tiny Races
  • Women
    • Race Calendar
    • Why race?
    • Women’s Teams
    • Racer Spotlights
    • More Women’s Racing posts
  • Shop
    • Watopia Map and Other Posters
    • ZI Indoor Cycling Kit
More
    RacingSpeed Tests

    Speed Tests: 4-Rider TTT Drafting with TT Bikes

    Eric Schlange
    By Eric Schlange
    October 7, 2022
    LAST UPDATED August 24, 2023
    24

    UPDATE: the test results below are now outdated, due to Zwift modifying their Pack Dynamics. See the latest version of these tests for accurate data.

    Our original TTT speed test post from 2020 gave team time trial riders some very welcome guidance about how to most efficiently ride their races. Then in 2021 Zwift rolled out “Pack Dynamics 3.0” and we ran a second test to see what, if anything, had changed in regards to TTT dynamics. (We found speeds hadn’t really changed, it was just harder to hold an efficient single-file formation due to a lack of sticky draft.)

    Then in August 2022 Zwift+WTRL announced enhanced TTT features, including the ability to use TT frames and still draft.

    Zwifters have been wondering how riding a TTT with a TT frame differs from riding it with a road frame. Is it just faster, or is the draft savings different? We decided to find out.

    Test Goals

    This set of follow-up tests set out to answer two questions:

    1. Is the power savings in TTT formations on a TT frame different than it is on a road bike?
    2. Are the different formations (churning or hybrid) more or less efficient on TT frames than they are on road bikes?

    Test Parameters and Methodology

    All of the test riders were set to 183cm height, 75kg weight, and rode Zwift TT frames with ZIPP 808 wheels.

    Tests were done in an isolated event on Watopia’s Tempus Fugit route because it’s the flattest on Zwift, and it has a timed section (Fuego Flats Reverse, 4.4 miles long) which could be used to precisely measure the speeds of each test formation.

    The ever-helpful James Bailey at Zwift HQ flipped the switch on our event so our TT bikes would be able to draft each other.

    All of the tests were done with four riders.

    Tests and Results

    Test 1: the Churn

    For our first test, we put all riders at the same 300W power setting. This resulted in a churning group of riders where one rider would surge from being in the draft near the back to being in the wind at the front, then dropping back to do it all over again. This “washing machine effect” is what you see at the front of many Zwift races.

    • All riders @ 300W
    • Segment time 9:53
    • Speed: 42.9 kph

    Test 2: Single File @300W

    The second test had the lead rider holding 300W, with the other three riders in single file behind, holding the minimum wattage possible to stay in formation. This is what you would see in an outdoor team time trial:

    • Rider 1 @ 300W, Rider 2 @250W, Rider 3 @ 225W, Rider 4 @ 214W
    • Segment time: 10:09
    • Speed: 41.7 kph

    Notes:

    • The “minimum wattages” stated for riders 2-4 on this test and other tests below should be considered approximations, as it is impossible to figure out the precise wattage required to hold formation due to Zwift’s dynamic physics engine and very small undulations in terrain, even on Fuego Flats.
    • Riders received power savings of 17%, 25%, and 29% – the same power savings seen in our road bike TTT tests. As expected, the further back you are, the bigger the draft effect.
    • In a TTT situation with all riders taking equal pulls on the front at these wattages, each rider would average 247W.
    • Test 2’s segment time was 16 seconds slower than Test 1’s, despite riders holding no higher than 300W in both tests. This may seem odd at first, but it’s a result of the “churn”. Riders are speeding up while in the draft, then shooting ahead into the wind, only to be slowed and have another rider shoot past them. This little speed boost accounts for a significant time difference, as we see here.
    • It’s worth noting here that we did a solo rider test at 300W steady, because we were curious if there was any advantage to the front rider if there were riders behind. There is not. Our solo rider turned in the same time as this 4-rider group.

    Test 3: Single File @350W

    This test is similar to Test 2, except we bumped up the front rider’s wattage to 350W to make sure the group would be faster than the churning pack in Test 1.

    • Rider 1 @ 350W, Rider 2 @293W, Rider 3 @ 271W, Rider 4 @ 246W
    • Segment time: 9:37
    • Speed: 44.1 kph

    Notes:

    • Riders received power savings of 16%, 23%, and 30% (2nd, 3rd, and 4th rider respectively). Almost identical to the power savings seen in our road bike TTT tests.
    • In a TTT situation with all riders taking equal pulls on the front at these wattages, each rider would average 290W. This is the crux of why TTT formation is so important: that even with Zwift’s “speed churning” from test 1, the four riders in this test significantly beat test 1’s time by riding efficiently in single file formation at a lower average wattage.

    Test 4: Single File @400W

    This test was very similar to Tests 2 and 3, we just bumped the front rider up to 400W.

    • Rider 1 @ 400W, Rider 2 @327W, Rider 3 @ 293W, Rider 4 @ 281W
    • Segment time: 9:06
    • Speed: 46.6 kph

    Notes:

    • Riders received power savings of 18%, 27%, and 30% (2nd, 3rd, and 4th rider respectively). Almost identical to the power savings seen in our road bike TTT tests.
    • In a TTT situation with all riders taking equal pulls on the front at these wattages, each rider would average 325W.

    Test 5: Hybrid

    For our final test we wanted to look at a strategy that many TTT teams use, wherein there is one designated rider in front, and the riders behind simply churn in the front rider’s draft. This reduces the hassle of trying to maintain single-file positioning while receiving some of the benefits. But how does it impact efficiency?

    • Rider 1 @ 400W, Riders 2, 3, and 4 at @319W steady
    • Segment time: 9:06
    • Speed: 46.6 kph

    Notes:

    • In a TTT situation with all riders taking equal pulls on the front, each rider would average 339W. So not as efficient as single-file riding (average wattage is 14W higher than the single file test). But a much easier formation to hold!

    Conclusions

    Let’s answer the two questions we stated at the top of the page:

    Is the power savings in TTT formations on a TT frame different than it is on a road bike?

    It is not. Given that there’s a slight margin of error here, we’re confident there is no detectable power savings (or cost) in TTT formations on road bikes vs TT bikes. You’ll just go faster on a TT frame, but your power to chase a rider holding, say, 400W in front will be the same as it was on a road bike.

    Are the different formations (churning or hybrid) more or less efficient on TT frames than they are on road bikes?

    We don’t think so. Again, the numbers in our TT tests were very close to those in our road tests.

    Single File or Hybrid Formation?

    Clearly “The Churn” is not a good TTT formation. So what’s better – the single file formation, or the “hybrid” approach?

    While the test results above confirm that single file is still the most efficient TTT formation on Zwift (as it is IRL), it’s much more difficult to hold a single file formation compared to the hybrid approach, especially on technical courses with lots of gradient changes and sharp turns.

    So the “best” formation for your TTT squad will be the formation they’re able to hold. If you can pull off single file, do it! But if not, go hybrid. Either way, smash it!

    Your Comments

    Got comments or questions? Share below!

    Related Posts

    Facebook
    Twitter
    Pinterest
    ReddIt
      Eric Schlange
      Eric Schlangehttp://www.zwiftinsider.com
      Eric runs Zwift Insider in his spare time when he isn't on the bike or managing various business interests. He lives in Northern California with his beautiful wife, two kids and dog. Follow on Strava

      24 COMMENTS

      Subscribe
      Notify of
      guest

      guest

      24 Comments
      Oldest
      Newest Most Voted
      Inline Feedbacks
      View all comments
      wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz

      Get Started on Zwift

      Sign Up (Free Trial)
      Buy Zwift Ride
      Buy KICKR CORE One
      Read More...

      Newest Featured Posts

      Garmin Releases Tacx Alpine Gradient Simulator

      Hardware/Equipment

      All About the New DT Swiss Wheels in Zwift

      Speed Tests

      Support This Site

      Write a post, shop through us, donate or advertise. Learn more

      NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

      Zwift tips and news every 2 weeks! Click to subscribe.

      More Posts

      “Allez Allez Allez!” ZRacing Series Details

      Events

      Zwift RoboPacer Cycling Route Schedule

      How Zwift Works

      Elite Announces New Zwift-Ready Avanti and Rivo Trainers

      Trainers

      Zwift Charts: Rate of New Road Construction from 2015 to Present

      Game Updates

      This community-driven site is maintained by Eric Schlange and a team of Zwift enthusiasts. Zwift Insider is independent of Zwift corporate (www.zwift.com), although Zwift does provide funding to help defray site costs.

      This site contains affiliate links to Amazon, Wahoo, and other brands. Zwift Insider makes a small commission on purchases made from these links, so please shop through them to support our efforts.

      Terms of Use/DMCA Copyright Policy

      Privacy Policy | Privacy Consent

      [email protected]

      Latest articles

      Garmin Releases Tacx Alpine Gradient Simulator

      Notable Zwift Events for the Weekend of June 28-29

      All About the New DT Swiss Wheels in Zwift

      Popular Categories

      • Racing1501
      • Events1007
      • News833
      • Training & Nutrition710
      • Interviews562
      • Routes & Maps442
      24
      0
      Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
      ()
      x
      | Reply
      Comment Author Info
      :wpds_smile::wpds_grin::wpds_wink::wpds_mrgreen::wpds_neutral::wpds_twisted::wpds_arrow::wpds_shock::wpds_unamused::wpds_cool::wpds_evil::wpds_oops::wpds_razz::wpds_roll::wpds_cry::wpds_eek::wpds_lol::wpds_mad::wpds_sad::wpds_exclamation::wpds_question::wpds_idea::wpds_hmm::wpds_beg::wpds_whew::wpds_chuckle::wpds_silly::wpds_envy::wpds_shutmouth:
      ‹ Back to Categories
      You are going to send email to

      Move Comment

    • Related Posts