Hello everyone. Today, I am excited to share with you my brand-new video tutorial and in-depth analysis of Zwiftalizer – the free online tool for reading Zwift game log files. This video has something for everyone, from complete Zwift newcomers to level 60 pros.
First, I cover the basics. Then I go over all the metrics in each chart step by step. Also, for the first time ever, I’m showing summary reports that use community data that I’ve been gathering for over two years – over two hundred thousand activities by ten thousand users. This level of in-depth research won’t be found anywhere else, folks. This is a Zwiftalizer exclusive. This happened with your help; this is your data!
Here is a sneak peek at what the video has to offer (video included at the bottom of the post)…
ANT+ vs Bluetooth Popularity
I delve into the topic of ANT+ vs Bluetooth connection type popularity among PC and Mac users, specifically looking at the trends between 2022 and 2023. I wanted to know if the increasing popularity of Bluetooth-centric gadgets like Zwift Play controls and Elite Strezo steering devices had affected Bluetooth adoption in the PC world. I won’t spoil the details here (you’ll have to watch the video for that!). I can share that the trends in usage between ANT+ and Bluetooth were fascinating.
ANT+ vs Bluetooth Reliability Debate Settled
I also go deep into the data to settle the often-debated topic of which technology is more reliable. Let’s just say, the data gathered from over two hundred thousand activities, logged by ten thousand users over two years, reveals a clear winner.
[adinserter block=”1″]
How ANT+ and Bluetooth Reliability Differs For Trainer Models
I also explore the reliability of wireless for various smart trainers and power meters. This part of the analysis required a careful approach to ensure fairness in comparison, considering different usage frequencies of devices. I examined everything from ANT+ connected power meters to the latest smart trainers on Bluetooth, and the insights I gathered were quite surprising.
Most Popular Graphics Profiles and Resolutions
Finally, I go back to the subject that made me want to make Zwiftalizer in the first place, way back in 2015: graphics performance for different devices. To be more specific, I find out which profiles and resolutions Zwiftalizer users use most often, as well as which laptops, PCs, and Macs are the most popular at each graphics setting. I will give you a spoiler alert for this one right now – it’s laptops, and by a whopping 80% across the board.
Check out the video
While I’m keen to share all the specifics and outcomes of my study, I’ll hold back here because the real depth and nuance of these findings are best explained through the video. So, if you’re as interested in the crowd-sourced data as I am, make sure to check out the full video for a comprehensive understanding of the current state of fitness equipment wireless connectivity and device reliability with Zwift. Trust me, it’s an eye-opener!
Subscribe and Like to Support Zwiftalizer
Now, I have a request. Please subscribe to my new YouTube channel and give my tutorial video a like. It’s completely free and really helps promote the channel. Who knows, maybe I’ll even make a few bucks from it one day to keep the site going. Zwiftalizer is a free service. Let’s keep it that way. Eric Min, CEO of Zwift, has given his own money to my project through Patreon in the past. Zwiftalizer users and I thank you very much for years of support. This is no longer the case. It might have been a mistake due to an expired credit card, but I don’t know because he wasn’t available for comment. I also no longer get any commission from the Amazon Affiliates program. It’s my fault. A link on my homepage did not lead to a specific product page or search results on Amazon.com, which is an immediate ban for life. Read those EULAs folks; they’re not messing around.
Thank you to everyone who has made a donation via PayPal, BuyMeACoffee and Patreon. More than ever, it’s because of you that the site stays up and running.
Great comparisons here, especially for the new M-series builds from the Fall, but I find it a very frustrating watch given how restricted Zwift’s graphics options are. (No fault of Mike’s of course!) M1 and M2 on macOS are locked to 60fps and ‘High’ even though they’re clearly capable of more. Zwift suggested they’ll take a fresh look at their profiles, but we’re left to wait for something that could take years.
Meanwhile, M1 and M2 are also available in iPads, but get saddled with Basic/30fps/720p, just because that’s what their builds have been set to ever since the first iOS release.
Please Zwift – stop wasting our hardware!
I’m not 100% that this is totally Zwift fault on the cap of 60 FPS. Running Zwift on an Intel mac with an eGPU, and since Zwift moved over to metal the cap has been in place. For a while they still had the OpenGL app along with the metal app, and you could specifically run OpenGL to bypass the metal app. With OpenGL there was no FPS cap, but on metal there is. So is this a limitation with MacOS and metal, or a cap that Zwift has placed on?
It’s not a limitation of Metal – have run No Man’s Sky at 120fps on macOS, and Resident Evil Village at 120fps on iPadOS without issue. (Both are Metal-only.)
Tried to join today. Got a messsage saying Exceeded daily email limit. ?
Thanks for bring this to my attention. It’s a budget constraint I set up for controlling hosting costs. I should be able to increase it tonight. Please try again tomorrow.
This is fixed.